yuck, this is a symptome of underlinking in readline. In their infinite wisdom readline's devs refuse to fix this old bug; it needs to be linked with libtinfo or other suchlike library, and it keeps resufacings in various forms...
I think I've made a patch to sage's readline for this, but it sometimes breaks for reasons I need to look at. As to external readline, I guess our spkg-configure.m4 will lead one to a broken build if the system's readline is underlinked, cause our setup takes no account of this... So apparently ubuntu 16.04 has an underlinked readline. On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14 PM Thierry <sage-googlesu...@lma.metelu.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > there is also a readline-related issue on 8.9 there: > > https://ask.sagemath.org/question/48276/building-sage-89-from-source-fails/ > > Ciao, > Thierry > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:46:00PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:27 AM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 09:07, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 02:22, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> something did not work as you installed libncurses5-dev, > > >>> as you still appear to miss > > >>> /usr/include/ncurses.h > > >>> (according to the new log: > > >>> configure:10315: checking for ncurses.h > > >>> configure:10315: result: no ) > > >>> > > >>> whereas > > >>> https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/libncurses5-dev/filelist > > >>> has this file listed... > > >>> > > >>> Could you check that > > >>> /usr/include/ncurses.h > > >>> is present on the box? > > >> > > >> > > >> It was not, but I think that yesterday I was confused and had installed > > >> it on a different machine from the one I reported on (too many windows > > >> open). I just checked by manually installing that package on all 6 > > >> machines, which did do the install in 5 cases while on the 6th it was > > >> already there -- and that 6th machine was one for which the original > > >> build had worked OK! (Yesterday I said that all 6 had failed the same > > >> way but in fact 5 had, the 6th was still building when I reported). > > >> > > >> For completeness I am attaching he latest config.log. > > >> > > >> I think that Samuel might have hit on something I did wrong. My bash > > >> history shows > > >> > > >> 1989 tar zxf 8.9.tar.gz > > >> 1990 cd sage-8.9 > > >> 1991 make configure > > >> 1992 make > > >> > > >> with no ./configure step. I must have thought that "make configure" was > > >> instead of that... > > >> > > >> I'll restart the 5 builds after doing ./configure (after ncurses-clean > > >> and readline-clean), and report back. > > > > > > > > > All went successfully. My only remaining question is: is I had done > > > ./configure aafter make configure and before make, would the build have > > > worked (without inctalling those ubuntu packages which had somehow never > > > been needed for previous builds)? > > > > > "make configure" is only needed if Sage's main configure script is updated. > > Just look at the target "configure" in the main Makefile > > > > I guess there could be a bug introduced in commit > > 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf > > as I mentioned above in the thread. > > Feel free to open a ticket, saying that Sage's 8.9 readline builds > > underlinked on ubuntu xenial > > > > > John > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:20 AM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 18:20, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Hi John, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Do you have > > >>> >> libncurses5-dev > > >>> >> installed? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > No only the package without -dev. > > >>> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> I guess not, as in your config.log I see > > >>> >> > > >>> >> conftest.cpp:56:21: fatal error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory > > >>> >> > > >>> >> and this header is provided by this package. > > >>> >> I'd say it's a bug in Ubunty xenial that libreadline-dev does not > > >>> >> depend on this package! > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Could you try installing it, then run > > >>> >> > > >>> >> make ncurses-clean > > >>> >> make readline-clean > > >>> >> ./configure > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > I did that. > > >>> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> and check whether system-wide readline is picked up? > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > Now config.log includes these lines > > >>> > > > >>> > configure:13881: === checking whether to install the readline SPKG === > > >>> > configure:13925: checking Installing ncurses? > > >>> > configure:13928: result: Yes. Install readline as well. > > >>> > configure:14176: === checking whether to install the pari SPKG === > > >>> > configure:14222: checking installing gmp/mpir or readline? > > >>> > configure:14224: result: yes; install pari as well > > >>> > configure:14565: result: using Sage's pari SPKG > > >>> > configure:14587: === checking whether to install the pari_nftables > > >>> > SPKG === > > >>> > configure:14631: checking installing pari? > > >>> > configure:14634: result: yes; install pari_nftables as well > > >>> > configure:14675: === checking whether to install the pkgconf SPKG === > > >>> > configure:14718: checking for pkg-config >= 0.29 > > >>> > configure:14794: result: /usr/bin/pkg-config > > >>> > configure:14807: result: using pkg-config from the system > > >>> > configure:14841: === checking whether to install the eclib SPKG === > > >>> > configure:14886: checking installing ntl or pari? > > >>> > configure:14889: result: yes; install eclib as well > > >>> > configure:14974: === checking whether to install the > > >>> > perl_term_readline_gnu SPKG === > > >>> > configure:15066: checking for perl module Term::ReadLine > > >>> > configure:15076: result: ok > > >>> > configure:15084: checking Term::ReadLine module... > > >>> > configure:15088: result: non-GNU > > >>> > > > >>> > which does not look right. Complete config.log isattached. > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> If yes, this should cure these machines... > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Dima > > >>> >> > > >>> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:01 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:42, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> > wrote: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona > > >>> >> >> <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> > wrote: > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik > > >>> >> >> >> <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > It seems that these machines don't have readline development > > >>> >> >> >> > files > > >>> >> >> >> > properly installed. > > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > Could you attach config.log ? > > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> I mean the "main" config.log, not the ones from package builds. > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > Here it is. I looks as if some version of readline was > > >>> >> >> > downloaded and installed. > > >>> >> >> no, it says that Sage's readline will be built, because according > > >>> >> >> to the test, > > >>> >> >> there is no ncurses (or tinfo) installed. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> So I am puzzled that you say that the machine has libreadline-dev > > >>> >> >> installed. > > >>> >> >> Could you post the contents of this package? > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > $ apt show libreadline-dev > > >>> >> > Package: libreadline-dev > > >>> >> > Version: 6.3-8ubuntu2 > > >>> >> > Priority: optional > > >>> >> > Section: libdevel > > >>> >> > Source: readline6 > > >>> >> > Origin: Ubuntu > > >>> >> > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers > > >>> >> > <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> > > >>> >> > Original-Maintainer: Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> > > >>> >> > Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug > > >>> >> > Installed-Size: 6,144 B > > >>> >> > Depends: libreadline6-dev (= 6.3-8ubuntu2) > > >>> >> > Conflicts: libreadline-gplv2-dev > > >>> >> > Supported: 9m > > >>> >> > Download-Size: 992 B > > >>> >> > APT-Manual-Installed: yes > > >>> >> > APT-Sources: http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 > > >>> >> > Packages > > >>> >> > Description: GNU readline and history libraries, development files > > >>> >> > The GNU readline library aids in the consistency of user interface > > >>> >> > across discrete programs that need to provide a command line > > >>> >> > interface. > > >>> >> > . > > >>> >> > The GNU history library provides a consistent user interface for > > >>> >> > recalling lines of previously typed input. > > >>> >> > . > > >>> >> > This package is a dependency package depending on > > >>> >> > libreadline6-dev. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> As well, I'd like to look at the output of > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> $ ldd `find /usr -name libreadline.so` > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> - which should look more or less like: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc2a2ce000) > > >>> >> >> libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 > > >>> >> >> (0x000079942a162000) > > >>> >> >> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000799429fa1000) > > >>> >> >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000079942a3f3000) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > It finds the system one as well as two sage installation ones. > > >>> >> > The system one is like what you expected: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libreadline.so: > > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffd459fe000) > > >>> >> > libtinfo.so.6 => > > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libtinfo.so.6 > > >>> >> > (0x00007f9940e43000) > > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > > >>> >> > (0x00007f9940a73000) > > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f99412d3000) > > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so: > > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe9e4ce000) > > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > > >>> >> > (0x00007f00db8e3000) > > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f00dbf03000) > > >>> >> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so: > > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffebbdd6000) > > >>> >> > libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 > > >>> >> > (0x00007f2e72d1b000) > > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > > >>> >> > (0x00007f2e7294b000) > > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2e73193000) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> I gather that the test we have for system's ncurses is too > > >>> >> >> restrictive, and doesn't work > > >>> >> >> even though it should... (So this is a potential Sage bug) > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> To continue with this problem: > > >>> >> >> Indeed, readline gets built by Sage, but it's a bit broken, as I > > >>> >> >> gather it's not linked > > >>> >> >> against libtinfo: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> To check this, please post the output of > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > $ ldd /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so.6 > > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffce3bbe000) > > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > > >>> >> > (0x00007fbee541b000) > > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fbee5a3b000) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> I don't know why this doesn't work, it might be something went > > >>> >> >> wrong in > > >>> >> >> ------------------ > > >>> >> >> commit 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf > > >>> >> >> Author: Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> >> Date: Wed May 1 10:58:00 2019 +0100 > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> get termcap library name from the readline's configure > > >>> >> >> -------------------- > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> (so this might be another Sage bug) > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> Fixing at least one of these bugs might cure the systems you > > >>> >> >> have, but > > >>> >> >> more info is needed... > > >>> >> >> What OS is that, precisely? > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > $ lsb_release -a > > >>> >> > No LSB modules are available. > > >>> >> > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > > >>> >> > Description: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS > > >>> >> > Release: 16.04 > > >>> >> > Codename: xenial > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > (Same for all 6 machines. I have tried to be consistent by > > >>> >> > reporting answers to your questions all from the same one.) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Sorry for trouble, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Not at all, thanks for your help. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > On a more positive note, my python3 build on one of these machines > > >>> >> > was fine after git pull trac develop. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Dima > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> And Python2 does not do a very good job gathering what extra libs > > >>> >> >> are needed, > > >>> >> >> as its confugure output says > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> checking how to link readline libs... -lreadline -ltermcap > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> but then the error happens in the linking where one does not see > > >>> >> >> -ltermcap, but > > >>> >> >> rather -lcursesw > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> (so this might be a Python2 bug) > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > I can of course install more ubuntu packages on these machines > > >>> >> >> > (though I do have libreadline-dev installed already) but that's > > >>> >> >> > not quite the point here. > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > John > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona > > >>> >> >> >> > <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to > > >>> >> >> >> > > build 8.9 I downloaded the file 8.9.tar.gz from the > > >>> >> >> >> > > Releases section on github. After unpacking and "make > > >>> >> >> >> > > configure" I then did "make". On 6 different machines, > > >>> >> >> >> > > all running ubuntu, all the builds failed with > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > Error building Sage. > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not > > >>> >> >> >> > > necessarily > > >>> >> >> >> > > during this run of 'make all-start'): > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > * package: python2-2.7.15.p1 > > >>> >> >> >> > > log file: > > >>> >> >> >> > > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/logs/pkgs/python2-2.7.15.p1.log > > >>> >> >> >> > > build directory: > > >>> >> >> >> > > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python2-2.7.15.p1 > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > One logfile is attached, they all fail the same easy: > > >>> >> >> >> > > something about readline. > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > The point here is not so much what I should do to get > > >>> >> >> >> > > around this, but rather, what is wrong with "make > > >>> >> >> >> > > configure; make" which led it to happen on machines where > > >>> >> >> >> > > the prerequisites for Sage are certainly all installed > > >>> >> >> >> > > since they all have working versions of 8.8 (and many > > >>> >> >> >> > > previous, and in some cases 8.9 prereleases) built from > > >>> >> >> >> > > the github repo. > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > John > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:07, Samuel Lelièvre > > >>> >> >> >> > > <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ## Debian > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from > > >>> >> >> >> > >> SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, > > >>> >> >> >> > >> both py2 and py3. In both cases: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - `make`: ok > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - `make testlong`: all tests pass! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ## Cygwin > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, > > >>> >> >> >> > >> with the following hardware and operating system: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - laptop: HP ProBook 640 G1 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - processor: Intel Core i7-4610M, 3.00 GHz > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - memory: 8 GB > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - Cygwin64 version: CYGWIN_NT-6.1 3.0.7 (0.338/5/3) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - Windows: Windows 7 Professional (64-bit), Service Pack 1 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Summary > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Here is a summary following this structure: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - [file] # [failures or timeouts during make testlong] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> [result when tested individually]; [ticket > > >>> >> >> >> > >> references] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - py2: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 doctests failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # Timed out after > > >>> >> >> >> > >> testing finished > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #27537 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - py3 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #26119 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; see #28472 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> (positive review) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; this is > > >>> >> >> >> > >> #28334 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Read on for the details for each of py2 and py3. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Python 2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > > >>> >> >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ... > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 doctests failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Timed out after testing finished > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/doctest/forker.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-19-19-2f160fbc. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [449 tests, 34.21 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 81.7 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.5 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 34.2 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-21-35-400c0707. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [294 tests, 33.43 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 34.0 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.2 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 33.4 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Python 3 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > > >>> >> >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ... > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest > > >>> >> >> >> > >> failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-10-19e3fc53. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [749 tests, 28.33 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 29.2 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 25.8 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 28.3 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-59-bd646d17. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> File "src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py", line 597, in > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> E.saturation([Q1,Q2]) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 0.801588644684981) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Attempt to round -0.2617840677e25 to a long int > > >>> >> >> >> > >> fails, aborting! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 0.801588644684981) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 9 in > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [192 tests, 1 failure, 5.96 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.5 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.7 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 6.0 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-01-55-2dd8733a. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [272 tests, 18.14 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 18.7 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 18.0 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 18.1 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-03-34-441e450a. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> File > > >>> >> >> >> > >> "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx", > > >>> >> >> >> > >> line > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 2055, in > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> G = f.galois_group(); G > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate > > >>> >> >> >> > >> memory. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 16 in > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [397 tests, 1 failure, 5.79 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest > > >>> >> >> >> > >> failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.3 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 4.7 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 5.8 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage_setup/clean.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-04-44-25198bd4. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> File "src/sage_setup/clean.py", line 100, in > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> for f in stale_iter: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> if f.endswith(skip_extensions): continue > > >>> >> >> >> > >> print('Found stale file: ' + f) > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected nothing > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Found stale file: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage/graphs/__pycache__/line_graph.cpython-37.pyc > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 11 in sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > > >>> >> >> >> > >> [17 tests, 1 failure, 0.51 s] > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest failed > > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 0.5 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 0.5 seconds > > >>> >> >> >> > >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >> -- > > >>> >> >> >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to > > >>> >> >> >> > >> the Google Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails > > >>> >> >> >> > >> from it, send an email to > > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> >> >> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> >> >> > >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF06vXMyROkEshs%3DYV1_500kbwPDhQGJBH39B14i8Ku3Qg%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> >> >> > > > > >>> >> >> >> > > -- > > >>> >> >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to > > >>> >> >> >> > > the Google Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails > > >>> >> >> >> > > from it, send an email to > > >>> >> >> >> > > sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> >> >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> >> >> > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7hW%3DTd2LqSa%2BybC-DrPgymFr8cvSHPRpEKnNwoMq%2Bpwg%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> -- > > >>> >> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >>> >> >> >> Google Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > > >>> >> >> >> it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1x7jY7f%3DeJ2u%2BdYuTE27H_3P%2B_9jRZtBGu8%2BaJv%3DUYRA%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > -- > > >>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >>> >> >> > Google Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > > >>> >> >> > it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K6FUy-q%3DZurAgHbi3j6vvwQwqhXOiYYQhntXv92wkEgJA%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> -- > > >>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > >>> >> >> Google Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > >>> >> >> send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq2X7zP4AKCkKrRtJObAwHKPO_-CDhApX5j6vD4pmk-f8g%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > -- > > >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >>> >> > Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > >>> >> > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K63ZXneidvbAbm%3DQG3Yu9xHfdPmm41nCXExnA2FTxZfdw%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> -- > > >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >>> >> Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > >>> >> send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq0Eknf6t%2BHZJiJdk%3D56ky285NuvqebsFuOPykSPaqub_A%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >>> > Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > > >>> > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7SQ9PYiz2dBN1rOtOu0LaXHotdNfzeMifm_1dBQgAPJA%40mail.gmail.com. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > >>> Groups "sage-release" group. > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > >>> an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > >>> To view this discussion on the web visit > > >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1bENcHJhdsfY9RUMuy%2BPYu3XbzMQW5w6reg9iJJX8JOA%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "sage-release" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K46p853ONCbEdqaBFiPWX8WhUSrkbrd6pw1W4REPrBVHw%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sage-release" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq3D7yLop-GbYMrKnR%2BQ8ofwRjsdJDpoD40%3DVFK2ZZPW5g%40mail.gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/20191011171358.usbfg2ekq2jnmq5x%40metelu.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq3isB2FLUqVMwV16o5KAgvkt7bO0W%2BJoGHZOeWh%3DcBJ8Q%40mail.gmail.com.
