Hi, there is also a readline-related issue on 8.9 there:
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/48276/building-sage-89-from-source-fails/ Ciao, Thierry On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:46:00PM -0500, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:27 AM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 09:07, John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 02:22, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> something did not work as you installed libncurses5-dev, > >>> as you still appear to miss > >>> /usr/include/ncurses.h > >>> (according to the new log: > >>> configure:10315: checking for ncurses.h > >>> configure:10315: result: no ) > >>> > >>> whereas https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/amd64/libncurses5-dev/filelist > >>> has this file listed... > >>> > >>> Could you check that > >>> /usr/include/ncurses.h > >>> is present on the box? > >> > >> > >> It was not, but I think that yesterday I was confused and had installed it > >> on a different machine from the one I reported on (too many windows open). > >> I just checked by manually installing that package on all 6 machines, > >> which did do the install in 5 cases while on the 6th it was already there > >> -- and that 6th machine was one for which the original build had worked > >> OK! (Yesterday I said that all 6 had failed the same way but in fact 5 > >> had, the 6th was still building when I reported). > >> > >> For completeness I am attaching he latest config.log. > >> > >> I think that Samuel might have hit on something I did wrong. My bash > >> history shows > >> > >> 1989 tar zxf 8.9.tar.gz > >> 1990 cd sage-8.9 > >> 1991 make configure > >> 1992 make > >> > >> with no ./configure step. I must have thought that "make configure" was > >> instead of that... > >> > >> I'll restart the 5 builds after doing ./configure (after ncurses-clean and > >> readline-clean), and report back. > > > > > > All went successfully. My only remaining question is: is I had done > > ./configure aafter make configure and before make, would the build have > > worked (without inctalling those ubuntu packages which had somehow never > > been needed for previous builds)? > > > "make configure" is only needed if Sage's main configure script is updated. > Just look at the target "configure" in the main Makefile > > I guess there could be a bug introduced in commit > 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf > as I mentioned above in the thread. > Feel free to open a ticket, saying that Sage's 8.9 readline builds > underlinked on ubuntu xenial > > > John > > > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:20 AM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 18:20, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi John, > >>> >> > >>> >> Do you have > >>> >> libncurses5-dev > >>> >> installed? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > No only the package without -dev. > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> I guess not, as in your config.log I see > >>> >> > >>> >> conftest.cpp:56:21: fatal error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory > >>> >> > >>> >> and this header is provided by this package. > >>> >> I'd say it's a bug in Ubunty xenial that libreadline-dev does not > >>> >> depend on this package! > >>> >> > >>> >> Could you try installing it, then run > >>> >> > >>> >> make ncurses-clean > >>> >> make readline-clean > >>> >> ./configure > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > I did that. > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> and check whether system-wide readline is picked up? > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Now config.log includes these lines > >>> > > >>> > configure:13881: === checking whether to install the readline SPKG === > >>> > configure:13925: checking Installing ncurses? > >>> > configure:13928: result: Yes. Install readline as well. > >>> > configure:14176: === checking whether to install the pari SPKG === > >>> > configure:14222: checking installing gmp/mpir or readline? > >>> > configure:14224: result: yes; install pari as well > >>> > configure:14565: result: using Sage's pari SPKG > >>> > configure:14587: === checking whether to install the pari_nftables SPKG > >>> > === > >>> > configure:14631: checking installing pari? > >>> > configure:14634: result: yes; install pari_nftables as well > >>> > configure:14675: === checking whether to install the pkgconf SPKG === > >>> > configure:14718: checking for pkg-config >= 0.29 > >>> > configure:14794: result: /usr/bin/pkg-config > >>> > configure:14807: result: using pkg-config from the system > >>> > configure:14841: === checking whether to install the eclib SPKG === > >>> > configure:14886: checking installing ntl or pari? > >>> > configure:14889: result: yes; install eclib as well > >>> > configure:14974: === checking whether to install the > >>> > perl_term_readline_gnu SPKG === > >>> > configure:15066: checking for perl module Term::ReadLine > >>> > configure:15076: result: ok > >>> > configure:15084: checking Term::ReadLine module... > >>> > configure:15088: result: non-GNU > >>> > > >>> > which does not look right. Complete config.log isattached. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> If yes, this should cure these machines... > >>> >> > >>> >> Dima > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:01 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:42, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona > >>> >> >> <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik > >>> >> >> >> <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > It seems that these machines don't have readline development > >>> >> >> >> > files > >>> >> >> >> > properly installed. > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > Could you attach config.log ? > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> I mean the "main" config.log, not the ones from package builds. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > Here it is. I looks as if some version of readline was > >>> >> >> > downloaded and installed. > >>> >> >> no, it says that Sage's readline will be built, because according > >>> >> >> to the test, > >>> >> >> there is no ncurses (or tinfo) installed. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> So I am puzzled that you say that the machine has libreadline-dev > >>> >> >> installed. > >>> >> >> Could you post the contents of this package? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > $ apt show libreadline-dev > >>> >> > Package: libreadline-dev > >>> >> > Version: 6.3-8ubuntu2 > >>> >> > Priority: optional > >>> >> > Section: libdevel > >>> >> > Source: readline6 > >>> >> > Origin: Ubuntu > >>> >> > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> > >>> >> > Original-Maintainer: Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> > >>> >> > Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug > >>> >> > Installed-Size: 6,144 B > >>> >> > Depends: libreadline6-dev (= 6.3-8ubuntu2) > >>> >> > Conflicts: libreadline-gplv2-dev > >>> >> > Supported: 9m > >>> >> > Download-Size: 992 B > >>> >> > APT-Manual-Installed: yes > >>> >> > APT-Sources: http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 > >>> >> > Packages > >>> >> > Description: GNU readline and history libraries, development files > >>> >> > The GNU readline library aids in the consistency of user interface > >>> >> > across discrete programs that need to provide a command line > >>> >> > interface. > >>> >> > . > >>> >> > The GNU history library provides a consistent user interface for > >>> >> > recalling lines of previously typed input. > >>> >> > . > >>> >> > This package is a dependency package depending on libreadline6-dev. > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> As well, I'd like to look at the output of > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> $ ldd `find /usr -name libreadline.so` > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> - which should look more or less like: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc2a2ce000) > >>> >> >> libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 > >>> >> >> (0x000079942a162000) > >>> >> >> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000799429fa1000) > >>> >> >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000079942a3f3000) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > It finds the system one as well as two sage installation ones. The > >>> >> > system one is like what you expected: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libreadline.so: > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffd459fe000) > >>> >> > libtinfo.so.6 => > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007f9940e43000) > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > >>> >> > (0x00007f9940a73000) > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f99412d3000) > >>> >> > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so: > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe9e4ce000) > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > >>> >> > (0x00007f00db8e3000) > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f00dbf03000) > >>> >> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so: > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffebbdd6000) > >>> >> > libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 > >>> >> > (0x00007f2e72d1b000) > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > >>> >> > (0x00007f2e7294b000) > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2e73193000) > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> I gather that the test we have for system's ncurses is too > >>> >> >> restrictive, and doesn't work > >>> >> >> even though it should... (So this is a potential Sage bug) > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> To continue with this problem: > >>> >> >> Indeed, readline gets built by Sage, but it's a bit broken, as I > >>> >> >> gather it's not linked > >>> >> >> against libtinfo: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> To check this, please post the output of > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > $ ldd /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so.6 > >>> >> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffce3bbe000) > >>> >> > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > >>> >> > (0x00007fbee541b000) > >>> >> > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fbee5a3b000) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> I don't know why this doesn't work, it might be something went > >>> >> >> wrong in > >>> >> >> ------------------ > >>> >> >> commit 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf > >>> >> >> Author: Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> Date: Wed May 1 10:58:00 2019 +0100 > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> get termcap library name from the readline's configure > >>> >> >> -------------------- > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> (so this might be another Sage bug) > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> Fixing at least one of these bugs might cure the systems you have, > >>> >> >> but > >>> >> >> more info is needed... > >>> >> >> What OS is that, precisely? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > $ lsb_release -a > >>> >> > No LSB modules are available. > >>> >> > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > >>> >> > Description: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS > >>> >> > Release: 16.04 > >>> >> > Codename: xenial > >>> >> > > >>> >> > (Same for all 6 machines. I have tried to be consistent by > >>> >> > reporting answers to your questions all from the same one.) > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Sorry for trouble, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Not at all, thanks for your help. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On a more positive note, my python3 build on one of these machines > >>> >> > was fine after git pull trac develop. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Dima > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> And Python2 does not do a very good job gathering what extra libs > >>> >> >> are needed, > >>> >> >> as its confugure output says > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> checking how to link readline libs... -lreadline -ltermcap > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> but then the error happens in the linking where one does not see > >>> >> >> -ltermcap, but > >>> >> >> rather -lcursesw > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> (so this might be a Python2 bug) > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > I can of course install more ubuntu packages on these machines > >>> >> >> > (though I do have libreadline-dev installed already) but that's > >>> >> >> > not quite the point here. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > John > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona > >>> >> >> >> > <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build > >>> >> >> >> > > 8.9 I downloaded the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases > >>> >> >> >> > > section on github. After unpacking and "make configure" I > >>> >> >> >> > > then did "make". On 6 different machines, all running > >>> >> >> >> > > ubuntu, all the builds failed with > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > Error building Sage. > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not > >>> >> >> >> > > necessarily > >>> >> >> >> > > during this run of 'make all-start'): > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > * package: python2-2.7.15.p1 > >>> >> >> >> > > log file: > >>> >> >> >> > > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/logs/pkgs/python2-2.7.15.p1.log > >>> >> >> >> > > build directory: > >>> >> >> >> > > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python2-2.7.15.p1 > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > One logfile is attached, they all fail the same easy: > >>> >> >> >> > > something about readline. > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > The point here is not so much what I should do to get around > >>> >> >> >> > > this, but rather, what is wrong with "make configure; make" > >>> >> >> >> > > which led it to happen on machines where the prerequisites > >>> >> >> >> > > for Sage are certainly all installed since they all have > >>> >> >> >> > > working versions of 8.8 (and many previous, and in some > >>> >> >> >> > > cases 8.9 prereleases) built from the github repo. > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > John > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:07, Samuel Lelièvre > >>> >> >> >> > > <samuel.lelie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> ## Debian > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from > >>> >> >> >> > >> SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, > >>> >> >> >> > >> both py2 and py3. In both cases: > >>> >> >> >> > >> - `make`: ok > >>> >> >> >> > >> - `make testlong`: all tests pass! > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> ## Cygwin > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, > >>> >> >> >> > >> with the following hardware and operating system: > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> - laptop: HP ProBook 640 G1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> - processor: Intel Core i7-4610M, 3.00 GHz > >>> >> >> >> > >> - memory: 8 GB > >>> >> >> >> > >> - Cygwin64 version: CYGWIN_NT-6.1 3.0.7 (0.338/5/3) > >>> >> >> >> > >> - Windows: Windows 7 Professional (64-bit), Service Pack 1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Summary > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> Here is a summary following this structure: > >>> >> >> >> > >> - [file] # [failures or timeouts during make testlong] > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> [result when tested individually]; [ticket > >>> >> >> >> > >> references] > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> - py2: > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 doctests failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # Timed out after > >>> >> >> >> > >> testing finished > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #27537 > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> - py3 > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #26119 > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; see #28472 > >>> >> >> >> > >> (positive review) > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 1 doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; this is #28334 > >>> >> >> >> > >> - src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> Read on for the details for each of py2 and py3. > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Python 2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > >>> >> >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong > >>> >> >> >> > >> ... > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> # 4 doctests failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # > >>> >> >> >> > >> Timed out after testing finished > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/doctest/forker.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-19-19-2f160fbc. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> [449 tests, 34.21 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 81.7 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.5 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 34.2 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-21-35-400c0707. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> [294 tests, 33.43 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 34.0 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.2 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 33.4 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> ### Python 3 > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually > >>> >> >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong > >>> >> >> >> > >> ... > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 doctest > >>> >> >> >> > >> failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-10-19e3fc53. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/coding/linear_code.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> [749 tests, 28.33 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 29.2 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 25.8 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 28.3 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-59-bd646d17. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> File "src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py", line 597, in > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > >>> >> >> >> > >> E.saturation([Q1,Q2]) > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected: > >>> >> >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, > >>> >> >> >> > >> 0.801588644684981) > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > >>> >> >> >> > >> Attempt to round -0.2617840677e25 to a long int fails, > >>> >> >> >> > >> aborting! > >>> >> >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, > >>> >> >> >> > >> 0.801588644684981) > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 9 in > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate > >>> >> >> >> > >> [192 tests, 1 failure, 5.96 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 > >>> >> >> >> > >> doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.5 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.7 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 6.0 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-01-55-2dd8733a. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx > >>> >> >> >> > >> [272 tests, 18.14 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> All tests passed! > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 18.7 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 18.0 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 18.1 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-03-34-441e450a. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> File > >>> >> >> >> > >> "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx", > >>> >> >> >> > >> line > >>> >> >> >> > >> 2055, in > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > >>> >> >> >> > >> G = f.galois_group(); G > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected: > >>> >> >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > >>> >> >> >> > >> Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate > >>> >> >> >> > >> memory. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 16 in > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group > >>> >> >> >> > >> [397 tests, 1 failure, 5.79 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 > >>> >> >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 doctest > >>> >> >> >> > >> failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.3 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 4.7 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 5.8 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-04-44-25198bd4. > >>> >> >> >> > >> Git branch: develop > >>> >> >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage > >>> >> >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> File "src/sage_setup/clean.py", line 100, in > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > >>> >> >> >> > >> Failed example: > >>> >> >> >> > >> for f in stale_iter: > >>> >> >> >> > >> if f.endswith(skip_extensions): continue > >>> >> >> >> > >> print('Found stale file: ' + f) > >>> >> >> >> > >> Expected nothing > >>> >> >> >> > >> Got: > >>> >> >> >> > >> Found stale file: > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage/graphs/__pycache__/line_graph.cpython-37.pyc > >>> >> >> >> > >> ********************************************************************** > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 of 11 in sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files > >>> >> >> >> > >> [17 tests, 1 failure, 0.51 s] > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # > >>> >> >> >> > >> 1 doctest failed > >>> >> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> >> >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cpu time: 0.5 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 0.5 seconds > >>> >> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >> >> > >> -- > >>> >> >> >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>> >> >> >> > >> Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> >> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails > >>> >> >> >> > >> from it, send an email to > >>> >> >> >> > >> sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> >> >> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> >> >> > >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF06vXMyROkEshs%3DYV1_500kbwPDhQGJBH39B14i8Ku3Qg%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> >> > > -- > >>> >> >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>> >> >> >> > > Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails > >>> >> >> >> > > from it, send an email to > >>> >> >> >> > > sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> >> >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> >> >> > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7hW%3DTd2LqSa%2BybC-DrPgymFr8cvSHPRpEKnNwoMq%2Bpwg%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>> >> >> >> Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > >>> >> >> >> it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1x7jY7f%3DeJ2u%2BdYuTE27H_3P%2B_9jRZtBGu8%2BaJv%3DUYRA%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>> >> >> > Google Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > >>> >> >> > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K6FUy-q%3DZurAgHbi3j6vvwQwqhXOiYYQhntXv92wkEgJA%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> >> >> Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > >>> >> >> send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq2X7zP4AKCkKrRtJObAwHKPO_-CDhApX5j6vD4pmk-f8g%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> >> > Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > >>> >> > send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K63ZXneidvbAbm%3DQG3Yu9xHfdPmm41nCXExnA2FTxZfdw%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> >> Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >>> >> an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq0Eknf6t%2BHZJiJdk%3D56ky285NuvqebsFuOPykSPaqub_A%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> > Groups "sage-release" group. > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >>> > an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7SQ9PYiz2dBN1rOtOu0LaXHotdNfzeMifm_1dBQgAPJA%40mail.gmail.com. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "sage-release" group. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > >>> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1bENcHJhdsfY9RUMuy%2BPYu3XbzMQW5w6reg9iJJX8JOA%40mail.gmail.com. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sage-release" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K46p853ONCbEdqaBFiPWX8WhUSrkbrd6pw1W4REPrBVHw%40mail.gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq3D7yLop-GbYMrKnR%2BQ8ofwRjsdJDpoD40%3DVFK2ZZPW5g%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/20191011171358.usbfg2ekq2jnmq5x%40metelu.net.
