conda packages are available now. We are now patch free except for https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28533 on Debian based distributions.
There are a couple of warnings in werkzeug that was not present when I tested 8.8. Other than that, few test failures from 8.8 remain the same. Isuru. On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:01 AM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 13:42, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:08, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:59 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > It seems that these machines don't have readline development files >> >> > properly installed. >> >> > >> >> > Could you attach config.log ? >> >> > >> >> I mean the "main" config.log, not the ones from package builds. >> > >> > >> > Here it is. I looks as if some version of readline was downloaded and >> installed. >> no, it says that Sage's readline will be built, because according to the >> test, >> there is no ncurses (or tinfo) installed. >> >> So I am puzzled that you say that the machine has libreadline-dev >> installed. >> Could you post the contents of this package? >> > > $ apt show libreadline-dev > Package: libreadline-dev > Version: 6.3-8ubuntu2 > Priority: optional > Section: libdevel > Source: readline6 > Origin: Ubuntu > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com> > Original-Maintainer: Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> > Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug > Installed-Size: 6,144 B > Depends: libreadline6-dev (= 6.3-8ubuntu2) > Conflicts: libreadline-gplv2-dev > Supported: 9m > Download-Size: 992 B > APT-Manual-Installed: yes > APT-Sources: http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 > Packages > Description: GNU readline and history libraries, development files > The GNU readline library aids in the consistency of user interface > across discrete programs that need to provide a command line > interface. > . > The GNU history library provides a consistent user interface for > recalling lines of previously typed input. > . > This package is a dependency package depending on libreadline6-dev. > > >> As well, I'd like to look at the output of >> >> $ ldd `find /usr -name libreadline.so` >> >> - which should look more or less like: >> >> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc2a2ce000) >> libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 (0x000079942a162000) >> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000799429fa1000) >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000079942a3f3000) >> > > It finds the system one as well as two sage installation ones. The system > one is like what you expected: > > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libreadline.so: > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffd459fe000) > libtinfo.so.6 => /usr/local/sage/sage-8.8/local/lib/libtinfo.so.6 > (0x00007f9940e43000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f9940a73000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f99412d3000) > /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so: > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe9e4ce000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f00db8e3000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f00dbf03000) > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so: > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffebbdd6000) > libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 > (0x00007f2e72d1b000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f2e7294b000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f2e73193000) > > >> >> I gather that the test we have for system's ncurses is too >> restrictive, and doesn't work >> even though it should... (So this is a potential Sage bug) >> >> To continue with this problem: >> Indeed, readline gets built by Sage, but it's a bit broken, as I >> gather it's not linked >> against libtinfo: >> >> To check this, please post the output of >> >> > $ ldd /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/lib/libreadline.so.6 > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffce3bbe000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fbee541b000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fbee5a3b000) > > > >> >> I don't know why this doesn't work, it might be something went wrong in >> ------------------ >> commit 584735d9abe44b079df2566f7f73b6a69aaea0cf >> Author: Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed May 1 10:58:00 2019 +0100 >> >> get termcap library name from the readline's configure >> -------------------- >> >> (so this might be another Sage bug) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> Fixing at least one of these bugs might cure the systems you have, but >> more info is needed... >> What OS is that, precisely? >> > > $ lsb_release -a > No LSB modules are available. > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > Description: Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS > Release: 16.04 > Codename: xenial > > (Same for all 6 machines. I have tried to be consistent by reporting > answers to your questions all from the same one.) > > >> >> Sorry for trouble, >> > > Not at all, thanks for your help. > > On a more positive note, my python3 build on one of these machines was > fine after git pull trac develop. > > > >> Dima >> >> >> And Python2 does not do a very good job gathering what extra libs are >> needed, >> as its confugure output says >> >> checking how to link readline libs... -lreadline -ltermcap >> >> but then the error happens in the linking where one does not see >> -ltermcap, but >> rather -lcursesw >> >> (so this might be a Python2 bug) >> >> >> >> > >> > I can of course install more ubuntu packages on these machines (though >> I do have libreadline-dev installed already) but that's not quite the point >> here. >> > >> > John >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:38 PM John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > For a change instead of updating the git repository to build 8.9 I >> downloaded the file 8.9.tar.gz from the Releases section on github. After >> unpacking and "make configure" I then did "make". On 6 different machines, >> all running ubuntu, all the builds failed with >> >> > > >> >> > > Error building Sage. >> >> > > >> >> > > The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily >> >> > > during this run of 'make all-start'): >> >> > > >> >> > > * package: python2-2.7.15.p1 >> >> > > log file: >> /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/logs/pkgs/python2-2.7.15.p1.log >> >> > > build directory: >> /usr/local/sage/sage-8.9/local/var/tmp/sage/build/python2-2.7.15.p1 >> >> > > >> >> > > One logfile is attached, they all fail the same easy: something >> about readline. >> >> > > >> >> > > The point here is not so much what I should do to get around this, >> but rather, what is wrong with "make configure; make" which led it to >> happen on machines where the prerequisites for Sage are certainly all >> installed since they all have working versions of 8.8 (and many previous, >> and in some cases 8.9 prereleases) built from the github repo. >> >> > > >> >> > > John >> >> > > >> >> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 09:07, Samuel Lelièvre < >> samuel.lelie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ## Debian >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster), upgraded from >> >> > >> SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git and tested SageMath 8.9, >> >> > >> both py2 and py3. In both cases: >> >> > >> - `make`: ok >> >> > >> - `make testlong`: all tests pass! >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ## Cygwin >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Cygwin64, tested SageMath 8.9, both py2 and py3, >> >> > >> with the following hardware and operating system: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> - laptop: HP ProBook 640 G1 >> >> > >> - processor: Intel Core i7-4610M, 3.00 GHz >> >> > >> - memory: 8 GB >> >> > >> - Cygwin64 version: CYGWIN_NT-6.1 3.0.7 (0.338/5/3) >> >> > >> - Windows: Windows 7 Professional (64-bit), Service Pack 1 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ### Summary >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Here is a summary following this structure: >> >> > >> - [file] # [failures or timeouts during make testlong] >> >> > >> --> [result when tested individually]; [ticket references] >> >> > >> >> >> > >> - py2: >> >> > >> - src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 doctests failed >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually >> >> > >> - src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # Timed out after testing >> finished >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #27537 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> - py3 >> >> > >> - src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # Timed out >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually; might be #26119 >> >> > >> - src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py # 1 doctest failed >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; see #28472 >> (positive review) >> >> > >> - src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 >> doctest failed >> >> > >> --> passes when tested individually >> >> > >> - src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 >> doctest failed >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually; this is #28334 >> >> > >> - src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 doctest failed >> >> > >> --> still fails when tested individually >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Read on for the details for each of py2 and py3. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ### Python 2 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong >> >> > >> ... >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py # 4 >> doctests failed >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py # >> >> > >> Timed out after testing finished >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-19-19-2f160fbc. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/doctest/forker.py >> >> > >> [449 tests, 34.21 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> All tests passed! >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 81.7 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.5 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 34.2 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-21-35-400c0707. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/parallel/map_reduce.py >> >> > >> [294 tests, 33.43 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> All tests passed! >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 34.0 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.2 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 33.4 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> ### Python 3 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Upgraded from SageMath 8.9.rc0 via git. >> >> > >> Ran `make`: success. Ran `make testlong` and individually >> >> > >> retested files that failed or timed out, see below. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ make testlong >> >> > >> ... >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py # >> Timed out >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py >> # 1 >> >> > >> doctest failed >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx # 1 doctest >> failed >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 >> doctest >> >> > >> failed >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 >> doctest failed >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-10-19e3fc53. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/coding/linear_code.py >> >> > >> [749 tests, 28.33 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> All tests passed! >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 29.2 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 25.8 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 28.3 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-07-58-59-bd646d17. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> File "src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py", line 597, in >> >> > >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate >> >> > >> Failed example: >> >> > >> E.saturation([Q1,Q2]) >> >> > >> Expected: >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, 0.801588644684981) >> >> > >> Got: >> >> > >> Attempt to round -0.2617840677e25 to a long int fails, >> aborting! >> >> > >> ([(1 : -27 : 1), (157 : 1950 : 1)], 3, 0.801588644684981) >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: >> >> > >> 1 of 9 in >> sage.libs.eclib.interface.mwrank_EllipticCurve.saturate >> >> > >> [192 tests, 1 failure, 5.96 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage/libs/eclib/interface.py >> # 1 >> >> > >> doctest failed >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.5 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 5.7 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 6.0 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-01-55-2dd8733a. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/finite_rings/finite_field_base.pyx >> >> > >> [272 tests, 18.14 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> All tests passed! >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 18.7 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 18.0 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 18.1 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-03-34-441e450a. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> File "src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx", >> line >> >> > >> 2055, in >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group >> >> > >> Failed example: >> >> > >> G = f.galois_group(); G >> >> > >> Expected: >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 >> >> > >> Got: >> >> > >> Exception (FLINT memory_manager). Unable to allocate memory. >> >> > >> Transitive group number 5 of degree 4 >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: >> >> > >> 1 of 16 in >> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_rational_flint.Polynomial_rational_flint.galois_group >> >> > >> [397 tests, 1 failure, 5.79 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 >> >> > >> src/sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_rational_flint.pyx # 1 >> doctest >> >> > >> failed >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 6.3 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 4.7 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 5.8 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> $ ./sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py >> >> > >> Running doctests with ID 2019-10-01-08-04-44-25198bd4. >> >> > >> Git branch: develop >> >> > >> Using --optional=build,dochtml,python2,sage >> >> > >> Doctesting 1 file. >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> File "src/sage_setup/clean.py", line 100, in >> sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files >> >> > >> Failed example: >> >> > >> for f in stale_iter: >> >> > >> if f.endswith(skip_extensions): continue >> >> > >> print('Found stale file: ' + f) >> >> > >> Expected nothing >> >> > >> Got: >> >> > >> Found stale file: >> sage/graphs/__pycache__/line_graph.cpython-37.pyc >> >> > >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> > >> 1 item had failures: >> >> > >> 1 of 11 in sage_setup.clean._find_stale_files >> >> > >> [17 tests, 1 failure, 0.51 s] >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> sage -t --long --warn-long 87.2 src/sage_setup/clean.py # 1 >> doctest failed >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > >> Total time for all tests: 1.0 seconds >> >> > >> cpu time: 0.5 seconds >> >> > >> cumulative wall time: 0.5 seconds >> >> > >> >> >> > >> -- >> >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google Groups "sage-release" group. >> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> > >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAEcArF06vXMyROkEshs%3DYV1_500kbwPDhQGJBH39B14i8Ku3Qg%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "sage-release" group. >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> > > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K7hW%3DTd2LqSa%2BybC-DrPgymFr8cvSHPRpEKnNwoMq%2Bpwg%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "sage-release" group. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1x7jY7f%3DeJ2u%2BdYuTE27H_3P%2B_9jRZtBGu8%2BaJv%3DUYRA%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "sage-release" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K6FUy-q%3DZurAgHbi3j6vvwQwqhXOiYYQhntXv92wkEgJA%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sage-release" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq2X7zP4AKCkKrRtJObAwHKPO_-CDhApX5j6vD4pmk-f8g%40mail.gmail.com >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K63ZXneidvbAbm%3DQG3Yu9xHfdPmm41nCXExnA2FTxZfdw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAD0p0K63ZXneidvbAbm%3DQG3Yu9xHfdPmm41nCXExnA2FTxZfdw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CA%2B01voMmGtpdeUWQXXEGwDVmNojO_Oge30Mzrc6tjHGT%2B5wm6A%40mail.gmail.com.
