On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:36:46 -0800 (PST)
> cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually this sum can't be done by Maxima, but Derive can do it (even
>> an old version of derive). do you have an idea of how this problem is
>> planning to be solved?
>
> As Robert Dodier pointed out, Maxima can actually do the sum, it is
> just a bug in the maxima interface which fails to call the right
> function. As he also mentioned, Maxima could probably solve this problem
> before any others.
>
> Here is a paragraph from A = B [1], p. 74:
>
>  R. W. Gosper, Jr., discovered his algorithm in conjunction with his
>  work on the development of one of the first symbolic algebra
>  programs, Macsyma. Because of his algorithm, Macsyma had a
>  seemingly uncanny ability to find simple formulas for sums of the
>  type (5.1.1).
>
> [1] http://www.math.upenn.edu/~wilf/AeqB.html
>
>
> Returning to the question of how Sage plans to handle this, the short
> answer is "I am working on it." :)
>
> We will have a completely new implementation of summation, independent
> of the one in Maxima. At the moment I have an implementation of the
> theoretical framework which lets you solve much more complicated
> sums than the ones above. Unfortunately, coming up with an interface
> that spares the user from the gory details of the theory will still be a
> challenge. Thus, it will be some time before these problems are
> handled natively in Sage, but then Sage will (hopefully) be more capable
> than the others out there.

Is it still a plan to make the symbolic package standalone, or will
this by tied and work only with the whole Sage?

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to