Well, I'm already starting to bother!! :)

If you need any help in reviewing that stuff (provided that I'm not a
mathematician), let me know.

Apart from the fact that I'll be out of country for work during next
week..

See you in 7 days!!

Maurizio

On 27 Feb, 17:12, Robert Dodier <robert.dod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 4:24 pm, mabshoff <michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-
>
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > Have you check with the Maxima folks? There is quite a bit of code in
> > contrib that isn't particularly well integrated. IMHO this is a place
> > where the Maxima folks could improve Maxima a lot by integrating the
> > code into the main Maxima codebase, i.e. there is a solver in there
> > that can handle a lot more systems than the default one and most
> > people will not look for another solver once the one in default Maxima
> > does not do what they want it to do.
>
> One of the projects I have on the back burner is to do a review
> of the all the junk in maxima/share, to sort out the stuff that
> can be merged into the core, or needs clean up, or should be axed.
> Feel free to bother me about it if you don't hear anything.
>
> Robert Dodier
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to