chuck_starchaser wrote: > >> I see. I think this is standard, because in this case the axes cross >> at zero so each tick on the y-axis is . > > Apparently Jason is on top of it, but just thought I'd mention the > axes > did NOT cross at zero; they crossed at ( 0.0, 0.75 ), which is why I > was > so confused at the beginning; --I also assumed they crossed at zero.
Yep, that hit me today in class (again). There were no numbers on the axes (or maybe one number), and the axes didn't cross at zero, which was totally confusing for a few seconds. Then I decided it would be too confusing and off-topic to explain to the students why they shouldn't pay any attention to the axes (we were just looking at what the function roughly looked like). Instead, I thought I'd really, really try to make time this weekend to finish my patch. Jason P.S. What's the target release date/feature freeze date for the next version of Sage? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
