I tested it with SMTP2POP3 with the following configurations: SMTP Send to Exchange Server, 1 out of 2 cycles, start on cycle 1 POP3 Recv from Exchange Server, 1 out of 2 cycles, start on cycle 2 SMTP Send to SMTP Gateway Server, 1 out of 2 cycles, start on cycle 1 POP3 Recv from Exchange Server, 1 out of 2 cycles, start on cycle 2
- and - SMTP Send to Exchange Server, 1 out of 4 cycles, start on cycle 1 POP3 Recv from Exchange Server, 1 out of 4 cycles, start on cycle 2 SMTP Send to SMTP Gateway Server, 1 out of 4 cycles, start on cycle 3 POP3 Recv from Exchange Server, 1 out of 4 cycles, start on cycle 4 Everything seemed to work fine. It was ooooh so much faster doing it this way as well. I'll also be staggering my disk space checks as Joep suggested (great idea)--hopefully this will further reduce the amount of time necessary to go through an entire cycle. Anyone else give this a test before I put it into production? Kevin Kevin Kruithof Class 3 Systems Administrator, Section 21b, Type 42, Platinum Edition Center for Useless Classification Expert Tech Group 916-677-1032 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority Must I understand from that, that you tested it and find it working correctly? dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaes, Joep Sent: Wed Nov 12 7:55 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority Damned, Dirk, you did it again. You are the master is customer support. Thanks, Joep Vaes C System developer / dept. of ISS Viasystems Mommers Echt Peutenweg 2 6101 VZ Echt The Netherlands Phone: + 31 (0)475-479-209 Fax: + 31 (0)475-488-500 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 16:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority OK that did it. Test and send those chocolates and flowers...(just like to mention that since I'm living in THE chocolate country that it will be difficult to find better chocolates then the ones we have :-)) http://beta.woodstone.nu (the start cycle can also be set when the priority is 1 out of 1. This means that for example the entry will only be check from cycle 27 on and then each cycle). dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Kruithof Sent: Wed Nov 12 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority This would also allow you to run SMTP2/POP3 checks on alternating checks. I'll send you flowers and chocolates if you do this, Dirk... Kevin Kevin Kruithof Class 3 Systems Administrator, Section 21b, Type 42, Platinum Edition Center for Useless Classification Expert Tech Group 916-677-1032 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority All is possible :-) I'll have to look at the implication on the rest of the app before being able to do it. Still I think it's a good "request". dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaes, Joep Sent: Wed Nov 12 2:18 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority The first one of Servers Alive. Joep -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 12 November 2003 14:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Priority And what is cycle 1? The first one of that entry of the first one of Servers Alive? dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaes, Joep Sent: Wed Nov 12 1:45 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] Priority Dirk, Most of my checks have a priority of "each cycle". The diskspace checks, however have a priority of "1 Out of 20 cycles". Now all cycles last e.g. 1 minute, but the 20th, 40th, etc. last 3 minutes since then all diskspace checks are done. I would like to have a feature that enables me to set the start cycle, e.g. the first diskspace check starts at cycle 1 (and further every 20 cycles), the second at cycle 2, etc. This enables me to spread the extra burden of the diskspace checks. Is that possible? Regards, Joep Vaes C System developer / dept. of ISS Viasystems Mommers Echt Peutenweg 2 6101 VZ Echt The Netherlands Phone: + 31 (0)475-479-209 Fax: + 31 (0)475-488-500 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at: www.viasystems.nl To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
