So you would use it on OpenBSD? And if you say Linux, what distribution of Linix?
Dirk Bulinckx. -----Original Message----- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stone Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:16 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] Agent based check We typically are looking for file system, cpu, and memory utilization, and running processes. Linux has the widest useage, while my personal preference is for OpenBSD. Licensing is always the sticky part. A site license would seem to be the best way to minimize your revenue. :-) If you price it too high the smaller to mid-size shops won't use it. Price it too low and everyone will use it and you won't make enough to cover the cost of supporting it. I'd think a per system method would be best. This could be sold individually or in bundles of 5,10,25,50, etc. Pricing I would think would need to be between 10 and 25USD. -Kevin Dirk Bulinckx wrote: > We already talked about this several times on the list, so you all > know by now that we're working on an agent based check too. > The first dev has been done on the Win32. > The next agent that we want to create is on another OS, probably some > kind of *NIX variant. But we do have some questions about it, and > that's were you can help me :-) > > * for what OS should we create an agent (and that you would use :-)) > * what kind of checks should that agent do > > What would you see as a acceptable price for the usage of an agent. > (to be more correct, the agents as such would be free of charge, it's > using them within SA that would have a cost. The standard edition of > SA will not be able to use the agents, the enterprise edition will be > able to use the agents. A "normal" enterprise license will be able to > access 2 remote agents (whatever OS they run), if you want to access > more then 2 remote agents, then you will have to add "licenses" to SA > for it. It's about that type of license cost that I'm seeking some feedback). > > > Dirk Bulinckx. > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to > salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.
