> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:43:03PM +0200, Aley Keprt wrote:
> > Although some programmers have good experience with C programming, I
must
> > radically call for C++.
>
> Not only would I not touch C++ with a bargepole, I also use an
> application that someone else wrote in C++ and it's a complete
> pain to compile and link because the silly name-mangling schemes
> that compilers use are incompatible with each other (and seem to
> change every 5 minutes, though that could just be my imagination).
>
> So register one vote against...
>
> imc

Okay, it's 1:1. Who's next.....?

I can hardly argue against you, when you say this.
It's a technical problem. On source level, the C++ code is good, isn't it?
I don't know what problems you face, when you compile a C++ program.
You use two or more compilers together? Then you need to mark those
methods and/or functions, which you want to use in other module, as
exported.
(Declarations extern "C", static, __cdecl helps everytime).

Also, C is not so compatible too, since Watcom C - one of the best
compilers - doesn't follow the standard of (all) other compilers.

I wonder, how much Sam C is compatible.....

Aley


Reply via email to