-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alex Crow wrote: > Depending on the version of Samba, it could be that "passdb expand > explicit = yes" is required. I ran across this in a similar situation > due to a change in default behaviour. > > Alex Alex,
Thanks for the info, I will investigate this, I am currently using version 3.2.11. I am using ldap as my backend, is the passdb expand explicit parameter compatible with such a configuration? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkqNvAAACgkQ5B+8XEnAvqsBmQCeNTbL9EqYl3OKOwgIsZ6kzE2e R2sAn1OCHsuX7FWybexBMqihlkKGvNtb =iSNF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba