Requiring proper DNS was one of the first things that popped into my head, but I would not put censoring past any provider. If mail is being refused for failing to follow established DNS standards or because all dial-up/residential connections (e.g. residential cable modem & DSL) are blacklisted, then the issue of non-delivery is really not an issue at all.
-Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 07:13 AM To: sambar List Member Subject: [sambar] Global routing rule for mail server I'd like to know as well. I think what AOL did was force many ISP's to add ptr records that they should have had in the first place. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "sambar List Member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 06:38:20 -0400 Subject: [sambar] Global routing rule for mail server > Out of curiosity, how is AOL violating the First Amendment? > > -Jeff > > At 10:29 PM 10/06/2003, svarvaro wrote: > >Since AOL is gratiously violating the first amendment by throwing our > >our emails, I now use my ISP for outgoing mail. Being a computer > >nut, I hate to give up the old MTA capabilities. I've seen that > >routing rules can be used to send AOL destined mail via the ISP, > >while using the MTA for all else. Can anyone layout the setup? I > >see where you can test for a text string such as "aol.com" in the > >"to" field. I also see where you can set this up in the global > >routing rules, but the forwarding box requires a mailbox name and not > >an ISP mail server such as mail.charter.net?? How do you do this??? > >:shock: ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe please go to http://www.sambar.ch/list/
