On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys, > > Jaliya Ekanayake wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" >> >>> That said, there are many areas of Mercury that still require serious >>> work: threading model, transactions, persistence model etc.. Maybe if we >>> combine the two and do a new version of Sandesha that'll be better all >>> around. That is, use Mercury as a source of ideas and code but not continue >>> "Mercury" in ASF but rather start a new effort to cut-n-paste stuff from >>> wherever and get a damned good RM impl out to our users. >>> >>> A big +1 for this. >> > > +1 from me, assuming we can get the cycles from people to make this happen. > Love to hear others' take on this - David? Ant? Amila? > +1 Chamikara > > Mercury can remain in wso2.org and we can EOL as the new one comes up and >>> starts working properly. >>> >> > +1. Solve our immediate problems now, and also plan for the future we'd > really like to see. > > The most important and positive thing I've gotten from this discussion is >>> that there's a vibrant and caring community around Sandesha. I have no >>> interest in trying to replicate that elsewhere and fracture this community. >>> >> > Well said, sir! > > --Glen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
