Hi Paul,
The proposal starts with a "state machine model" which Mercury has come up
with.
So can you give little bit more details on the state machine model that you
are suggesting?
Thanks,
Jaliya
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal
Hi Paul:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I have posted a proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/ws-sandesha/MercuryProposal
Please edit, improve, or discuss.... I put this in the wiki so that it
could be modified.
Hm... I thought where we'd ended up discussion-wise was that we would get
the Mercury code granted to Apache so that it could be examined / learned
from / experimented with, but that we would aim to create a "third way" as
the next step for both projects.
In other words, the actual work that happens to make the new "unified" RM
implementation (whatever it ends up being called) would start with a clean
slate and take whatever it can from both Sandesha and Mercury, with the
goal of making sure that all the active developers are involved and
empowered. Did I understand that right?
Your proposal makes it sound rather like we're going to just start from
the existing Mercury code and go from there.
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
