And a link: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702/wsrm-1.1-spec-os-01.html
Paul On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jaliya > > Actually, although Mercury has got a state machine model, I would > personally prefer if we started directly from the State Machine > published in the Appendix of the WSRM1.1 specification, and worked > from here. I think we need two different implementations of a SM - one > for 1.0 and one for 1.1, so we would have to create the equivalent > documentation for 1.0. Amila has a pretty good starting point for the > 1.0 SM, and there needs to be some further discussion about exactly > how that should look. > > Paul > > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jaliya Ekanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> The proposal starts with a "state machine model" which Mercury has come up >> with. >> So can you give little bit more details on the state machine model that you >> are suggesting? >> >> Thanks, >> Jaliya >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:53 PM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Mercury Proposal >> >> >>> Hi Paul: >>> >>> Paul Fremantle wrote: >>>> >>>> I have posted a proposal here: >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/ws-sandesha/MercuryProposal >>>> >>>> Please edit, improve, or discuss.... I put this in the wiki so that it >>>> could be modified. >>> >>> Hm... I thought where we'd ended up discussion-wise was that we would get >>> the Mercury code granted to Apache so that it could be examined / learned >>> from / experimented with, but that we would aim to create a "third way" as >>> the next step for both projects. >>> >>> In other words, the actual work that happens to make the new "unified" RM >>> implementation (whatever it ends up being called) would start with a clean >>> slate and take whatever it can from both Sandesha and Mercury, with the goal >>> of making sure that all the active developers are involved and empowered. >>> Did I understand that right? >>> >>> Your proposal makes it sound rather like we're going to just start from >>> the existing Mercury code and go from there. >>> >>> --Glen >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 > Apache Synapse PMC Chair > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 Apache Synapse PMC Chair OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
