I'm with Webfaction also. I'm thinking about rewriting the processing to stop looking at the cache. I'm not sure why the system can't use the database in the absence of the cache. Wouldn't that make sense?
On Feb 20, 1:34 pm, django_jedi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 20, 12:45 pm, twjackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > MORE INFO: > > > It seems to me that I'm having the problem identified here in 2008: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-developers/browse_thread/threa... > > > On Feb 20, 10:44 am, twjackson <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've run into a very similar issue on more than one of our Satchmo > sites. For some reason that we haven't been able to figure out, > memcached stops working. That causes e-commerce to stop working. We > restart memcached and then restart the server and then everything's > fine again. > > But - why does this happen in the first place? Our host is > Webfaction; they confirmed in the most recent case that they did not > make any changes to the server in the 48 hour window prior to the > memcached failure. > > Anyone have any ideas as to how we can come up with a bulletproof > solution? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en.
