Dear something,I wanted to see how group registrations were handled. I was speechless when I saw these comments from the tasks.
==============> I did explain the misunderstanding on the last time, but had no follow up.
I'm sorry, I think I had no time.> What are you saying? That I'm banned or that I need to state a better reason? You filed exactly the same submission again, didn't you? In my book, that doesn't count as learning one's lesson.
============== https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/index.php?16489 ===Savannah doesn't provide "just git repositories," repositories only come with groups in Savannah. And sincerely speaking, I can't think of real cases where this program could be useful.
=== https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16293 ====================== > a vanilla MIT license. It looks like we don't listen to each other. Too bad. ====================== https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16459 =====This submission is also likely to have other similar issues, but I'm afraid we have no common language to even discuss them.
===== https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16390 Then this, as a result of such communication style. ======== Hi ineiev, many thanks for your reply.I have decided to withdraw my submission from Savannah and will no longer renew my more-than-a-decade long membership to the FSF.
======== https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16254Is this how we are supposed to talk to people? Do I need to point out the obvious problem here?
Since 90+% of the tasks are cancelled, why don't we just close group registration completely? That way we don't hurt GNU or FSF's reputation.
-- Jing Luo About me: https://jing.rocks/about/ PGP Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature