[self-follow-up]

I had some proofreading failures here.  I'll fix a few of them inline.

At 2024-03-02T05:36:43-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> What percentage of non-cancellation would lead you to believe that
> Savannah's non-GNU hosting service was serving its function well?
> 
> And indeed is a percentage a valid and worthy metric for measuring
> such a thing?
[...]
> I warned RMS literally 20 years ago[1] that people would abuse
> Invariant Sections, mainly by marking as "Invariant" stuff that WASN'T
> logically "Secondary".[2]

That one was pretty bad.  :-O  Fixed now.

> [1] Here's a summary from a mere 19 years ago.
> 
>     https://www.linux.com/news/gnu-free-documentation-license/
> 
> [2] Even official GNU projects managed this; some, at least, got fixed.

Regards,
Branden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

  • [Savannah-hackers-pu... Discussions among Savannah Hackers, open subscription
    • Re: [Savannah-h... G. Branden Robinson
      • Re: [Savann... Discussions among Savannah Hackers, open subscription
        • Re: [Sa... G. Branden Robinson
          • Re:... Discussions among Savannah Hackers, open subscription
            • ... Discussions among Savannah Hackers, open subscription
      • Re: [Savann... G. Branden Robinson

Reply via email to