Follow-up Comment #30, sr #111226 (group administration): On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Hossein wrote: > https://codeberg.org/hossein/jcal/commit/c1d73a6ac651a5d521f1bc56f97fe60ab14ec54a > > Thanks to your reply, in the commit above I: > 1. Changed HTTP to HTTPS wherever I could (only place not affected is the > docs > made by man2html. I had problems with Perl which I will solve in the future) > 2. During the process I realized there are links to Ashkan's email, and I > replaced them with Savannah's bug tracker.
Thanks!
>> Can you explain why?
>
> Sure, I believe that the Makefile.am in test kits are trivial, for example if
> we remove the trivial lines of 8 to 15 from
> sources/test_kit/jalali/Makefile.am , and then the empty lines, we're left
> with 5 lines of code that are trivial to begin with.
This reasoning doesn't seem perfect to me. Any usual line of code
is noncopyrightable, but they sum up to programs like Emacs.
Do I miss some point?
However, I agree that sources/test_kit/jalali/Makefile.am is not
very long and shouldn't relly be problematic (I'm not so sure
for sources/Makefile.am and even less for sources/setup.py).
On the other hand, it wouldn't hurt to add the notices to be
on the safe site while you are working on this issue in your
package.
> However important files such as autogen.sh already have a copyright header so
> we're fine there.
Sure thing. What about files like sources/configure.ac?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?111226>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
