Hi Martin, 2011/11/30 Martin Hamant <[email protected]>: > > > Le 30/11/2011 10:19, David Baelde a écrit : >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Martin Hamant<[email protected]> wrote: >>> The MP3 file is the one encoded thru audacity / liblame (128kbit/s / stéréo) >>> directly from the original lossless source. >>> In the WAV file (44.1k/16b) I have recorded the LS 128kbit/s output stream >>> (so, thru IceCast and played with foobar2000) >> No time right now (and no sound while at the office) but for a better >> test, please try with a liquidsoap file output, not through icecast. >> >> David > > Here is the file which contains the two MP3 files to compare. > http://rvbnd1.1fichier.com/ > > Same result.... This is very weird.
Thanks for your efforts. It is probably this time when I am going to realize that my hearing has suffered but I have very hard time noticing the artefacts you mention in the file encoded by liquidsap.. Could you further elaborate on them..? Romain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Savonet-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
