scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/06/29 [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features John Cowan
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven John Cowan
• 2012/06/28 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Wolfgang De Meuter
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) Andrew Robbins
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports John Cowan
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) Arthur Smyles
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) Arthur Smyles
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Per Bothner
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/06/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/27 [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Wolfgang De Meuter
• 2012/06/21 [Scheme-reports] Reminder: public comment period on R7RS-small closes on June 30 John Cowan
• 2012/06/21 [Scheme-reports] (no subject) Johan van der Teems
• 2012/06/21 [Scheme-reports] (no subject) Johan van der Teems
• 2012/06/13 [Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations Göran Weinholt
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Mark H Weaver
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
• 2012/06/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
• 2012/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Mark H Weaver
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Duncan Steele
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/06/06 [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Duncan Steele
• 2012/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/05 [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule Mike Morgan
• 2012/05/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan
• 2012/05/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan
• 2012/05/16 [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example John Cowan
• 2012/05/14 [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
• 2012/05/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
• 2012/05/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
• 2012/05/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete John Cowan
• 2012/05/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/05/12 [Scheme-reports] Trac Migration Complete Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
• 2012/05/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
• 2012/05/10 [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Noah Lavine
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alan Watson
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/05/10 [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
• 2012/05/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Peter Bex
• 2012/05/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
• 2012/05/09 [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
• 2012/05/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/05/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Ray Dillinger
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Per Bothner
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Andrew Robbins
• 2012/05/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alan Watson
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/05/07 [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Stephen Leach
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/05/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/05/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• 2012/04/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
• 2012/04/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• 2012/04/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
• 2012/04/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• 2012/04/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
• 2012/04/28 [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• 2012/04/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages