scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/07/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/13 [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors Marijn
• 2012/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot John Cowan
• 2012/07/12 [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force Devon Schudy
• 2012/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot John Cowan
• 2012/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/12 [Scheme-reports] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot John Cowan
• 2012/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Boyle
• 2012/07/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• 2012/07/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/07/10 [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Boyle
• 2012/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Boyle
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics John Cowan
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Perry E. Metzger
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics will
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Boyle
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/06 [Scheme-reports] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] John Cowan
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Eli Barzilay
• 2012/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Perry E. Metzger
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics John Cowan
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Perry E. Metzger
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] values [was: Opinion about R7RS] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics John Cowan
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics John Cowan
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alan Watson
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Adoption of R6RS Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: What is a dynamic environment? Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/04 [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber
• 2012/07/04 [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: What is a dynamic environment? Michael Sperber
• 2012/07/04 [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics Michael Sperber
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion Andrew Robbins
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Pierpaolo Bernardi
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Kun Liang
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] drop string-map and string-for-each John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/02 [Scheme-reports] drop string-map and string-for-each Per Bothner
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles? John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Michael Lenaghan
• 2012/07/02 [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated Per Bothner
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles? Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/02 [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles? Per Bothner
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Richard Kelsey
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Per Bothner
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Per Bothner
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Richard Kelsey
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Robert Smith
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Boyle
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Peter Bex
• 2012/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Peter Bex
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Alan Watson
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Alan Watson
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files Alan Watson
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Per Bothner
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Eli Barzilay
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Aaron W . Hsu
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Per Bothner
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Bakul Shah
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Jonathan Rees
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Jonathan Rees
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Eli Barzilay
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Jonathan Rees
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] string-fill! Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Alex Shinn
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes John Cowan
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] string-fill! Ray Dillinger
• 2012/07/01 [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/01 [Scheme-reports] string-fill! Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Marc Feeley
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value Peter Bex
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Peter Bex
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Peter Bex
• 2012/07/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value John Cowan
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open? Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] digit-value Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Marc Feeley
• 2012/06/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/30 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/29 [Scheme-reports] Reminder: R7RS public comment period William D Clinger
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS John Cowan
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/06/29 [Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
• 2012/06/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
• 2012/06/29 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception Richard Kelsey
• 2012/06/29 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules Richard Kelsey

• Earlier messages
• Later messages