scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2012/04/22 [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
• 2012/04/19 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbolelement>*| to #"<string element>*" Cory Burgett
• 2012/04/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? John Cowan
• 2012/04/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? leppie
• 2012/04/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? John Cowan
• 2012/04/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar John Cowan
• 2012/04/14 [Scheme-reports] I/O Kristen Eisenberg
• 2012/04/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/13 [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar Alan Watson
• 2012/04/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan
• 2012/04/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan
• 2012/04/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) John Cowan
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Marc Feeley
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) Andrew Robbins
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Jeronimo Pellegrini
• 2012/04/12 [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) Peter Bex
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Peter Bex
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Queiroz
• 2012/04/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Peter Bex
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan
• 2012/04/11 [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 xacc.ide
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 Per Bothner
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 John Cowan
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 John Cowan
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319 Ray Dillinger
• 2012/04/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 leppie
• 2012/04/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319 Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/10 [Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319 John Cowan
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO John Cowan
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Andy Wingo
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Andy Wingo
• 2012/04/09 [Scheme-reports] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO John Cowan
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Peter Bex
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/04/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/04/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/04/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
• 2012/04/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Aleksej Saushev
• 2012/04/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Emmanuel Medernach
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. John Cowan
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Alex Shinn
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Noah Lavine
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line John Cowan
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Bill Schottstaedt
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line John Cowan
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line Bill Schottstaedt
• 2012/04/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line John Cowan
• 2012/04/04 [Scheme-reports] command-line Bill Schottstaedt
• 2012/04/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] fifth ballot results are in John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Per Bothner
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Per Bothner
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Alan Watson
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS. John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Aubrey Jaffer
• 2012/03/29 [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS. Ray Dillinger
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Alan Watson
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) John Cowan
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/29 Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/28 [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes Alan Watson
• 2012/03/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) John Cowan
• 2012/03/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) John Cowan
• 2012/03/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/28 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) Alan Watson
• 2012/03/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Andrew Robbins
• 2012/03/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Ref cells John Cowan
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax John Cowan
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax quad
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax quad
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Andrew Robbins
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Stefan Edwards
• 2012/03/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Andrew Robbins
• 2012/03/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/03/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax John Cowan
• 2012/03/25 [Scheme-reports] Ref cells Biep
• 2012/03/25 [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax quad
• 2012/03/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan John Cowan
• 2012/03/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan xacc.ide
• 2012/03/25 [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan Peter Bex
• 2012/03/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. John Cowan
• 2012/03/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. Biep
• 2012/03/23 [Scheme-reports] The history of EQV? on numbers John Cowan
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? John Cowan
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? John Cowan
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? Peter Bex
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? Peter Bex
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? Andrew Robbins
• 2012/03/23 [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers? Peter Bex
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. John Cowan
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value John Cowan
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value Peter Bex
• 2012/03/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value Peter Bex
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value John Cowan
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value Peter Bex
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. Jussi Piitulainen
• 2012/03/22 [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well.. Biep
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Andy Wingo
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Andy Wingo
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples leppie
• 2012/03/22 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples leppie
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Andy Wingo
• 2012/03/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Per Bothner
• 2012/03/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Helmut Eller
• 2012/03/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples John Cowan
• 2012/03/19 [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples Per Bothner
• 2012/03/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2012/03/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson
• 2012/03/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan
• 2012/03/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan
• 2012/03/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses leppie
• 2012/03/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses leppie
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses leppie
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses leppie
• 2012/03/14 [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/03/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Noah Lavine
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. Alan Watson
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. Alan Watson
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Aaron W. Hsu
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Per Bothner
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Marijn
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Peter Bex
• 2012/03/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Ray Dillinger
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Arthur Smyles
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Andrew Robbins
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Arthur Smyles
• 2012/03/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
• 2012/03/12 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Arthur Smyles
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. John Cowan
• 2012/03/11 [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI. Alan Watson
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification John Cowan
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc John Cowan
• 2012/03/11 Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc Alex Shinn
• 2012/03/04 [Scheme-reports] Centered Division Noah Lavine
• 2012/03/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists Per Bothner
• 2012/03/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists Eli Barzilay
• 2012/03/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists Per Bothner
• 2012/03/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists John Cowan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages