scheme-reports  

Messages by Date

• 2013/09/08 [Scheme-reports] R7RS final draft - bug report for section 7.3 Derived expression types Joseph Wayne Norton
• 2013/09/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Alex Shinn
• 2013/09/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Per Bothner
• 2013/09/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Alex Shinn
• 2013/09/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Alex Shinn
• 2013/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Per Bothner
• 2013/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Per Bothner
• 2013/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Per Bothner
• 2013/09/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Peter Bex
• 2013/08/31 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Alex Shinn
• 2013/08/31 [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite? Per Bothner
• 2013/08/30 [Scheme-reports] I just signed “Speaker of the Lok Sabha Shrimati Meira Kumar: Send the RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2013 to a Standing Committee/Select Committee ” Nataraj S Narayan
• 2013/08/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=? John Cowan
• 2013/08/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=? Erik Falor
• 2013/08/25 [Scheme-reports] boolean=? Per Bothner
• 2013/08/21 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
• 2013/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
• 2013/08/20 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers John Cowan
• 2013/08/20 [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers Joseph Wayne Norton
• 2013/07/25 [Scheme-reports] Stop, please! Musical Notation
• 2013/07/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John David Stone
• 2013/07/25 [Scheme-reports] We can stop talking about licensing now Musical Notation
• 2013/07/25 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Hikari Boulders
• 2013/07/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
• 2013/07/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Kevin Wortman
• 2013/07/24 Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Is R6RS in the public domain? Hikari Boulders
• 2013/07/23 [Scheme-reports] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing Musical Notation
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Perry E. Metzger
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John David Stone
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant John Cowan
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Musical Notation
• 2013/07/23 Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2013/07/23 [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant Musical Notation
• 2013/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/18 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
• 2013/07/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
• 2013/07/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Alex Shinn
• 2013/07/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Kevin Wortman
• 2013/07/17 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Marijn
• 2013/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
• 2013/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Roderic Morris
• 2013/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Ray Dillinger
• 2013/07/16 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Marijn
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Alexey Radul
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Noah Lavine
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Kevin Wortman
• 2013/07/15 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through John Cowan
• 2013/07/15 [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 112, Environment inquiry John Cowan
• 2013/07/15 [Scheme-reports] SRFI 111, Boxes, added to R7RS-large John Cowan
• 2013/07/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through John Cowan
• 2013/07/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
• 2013/07/14 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
• 2013/07/13 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Perry E. Metzger
• 2013/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Alex Shinn
• 2013/07/12 [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through Chris Hanson
• 2013/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
• 2013/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Ray Dillinger
• 2013/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators John Cowan
• 2013/07/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators Andrew Robbins
• 2013/07/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/10 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Kevin Wortman
• 2013/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
• 2013/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Kevin Wortman
• 2013/07/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/07 [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Grant Rettke
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Shiro Kawai
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Alan Watson
• 2013/07/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language John Cowan
• 2013/07/06 [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language Alex Shinn
• 2013/07/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes John Cowan
• 2013/07/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes Daniel Villeneuve
• 2013/07/02 [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes John Cowan
• 2013/06/12 Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/09 [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility William D Clinger
• 2013/06/09 [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Christian Stigen Larsen
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alexey Radul
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Andy Wingo
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Andy Wingo
• 2013/06/09 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Kevin Millikin
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alexey Radul
• 2013/06/08 [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan
• 2013/06/08 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/08 [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve
• 2013/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Takashi Kato
• 2013/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan
• 2013/06/07 [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve
• 2013/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan
• 2013/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2013/06/07 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Andy Wingo
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate xacc.ide
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/06 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedure equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Shiro Kawai
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2013/06/05 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Noah Lavine
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner
• 2013/06/04 [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4 Gerald Jay Sussman
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2013/06/04 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2013/06/04 [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will
• 2013/06/03 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger
• 2013/06/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn
• 2013/06/02 Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Peter Bex
• 2013/06/01 [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan
• 2013/06/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan
• 2013/06/01 Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance Taylan Ulrich B.
• 2013/06/01 [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan
• 2013/05/29 [Scheme-reports] Steering Committee requests one more draft of the R7RS small language document will
• 2013/05/28 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Biep
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alex Shinn
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alex Shinn
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alaric Snell-Pym
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alexey Radul
• 2013/05/27 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Biep
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions Alex Shinn
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alex Shinn
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alexey Radul
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alex Shinn
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alexey Radul
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Evan Hanson
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Alexey Radul
• 2013/05/26 [Scheme-reports] Updated sets pre-SRFI and implementation John Cowan
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables John Cowan
• 2013/05/26 Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages