Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > If some implementation includes a compatible superset of > `define-record-type' that uses the same name, it would be useful to > be able to distinguish it from the standard one by using a different > module name. Putting the standard one in a module makes it easier to > manage this.
Only trivially so. Generative types are something really new in R7RS compared to R5RS (though old in implementations), and implementations shouldn't be licensed to omit them. > Sure it's a revision of R6RS. It's just that the edits are major. Yeesh. And the U.S. Constitution is a revision of the Articles of Confederation, by the same token. -- Barry thirteen gules and argent on a canton azure John Cowan fifty mullets of five points of the second, [email protected] six, five, six, five, six, five, six, five, and six. --blazoning the U.S. flag http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
