> > Only trivially so. Generative types are something really new in R7RS > compared to R5RS (though old in implementations), and implementations > shouldn't be licensed to omit them.
Can we say that that module, in particular, is required? Or do we just not get enough value out of putting it into a module to make a difference? > > Sure it's a revision of R6RS. It's just that the edits are major. > > Yeesh. And the U.S. Constitution is a revision of the Articles of > Confederation, by the same token. > It's a revision of R6RS in the same way that R6RS was a revision of R5RS. It's a good naming system, and everyone will immediately understand what R7RS means, especially if we have "R7RS-big" and "R7RS-small." What about my question about BNF?
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
