-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2011 02:07 PM, Alex Shinn wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote: >> >>> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the >>> compiler >>> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It may >>> even >>> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation. >>> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause >>> problems >>> for such a compiler. >> >> Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't >> cope with this? > > Chicken's inline egg would not support this. That's intended > for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL > replacement.
I'll discount that one, then, as it merely "could be" :-) ABS - -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6Fv8MACgkQRgz/WHNxCGpB0wCfZeMEgNOD3Zfbtv0tgenrMxaM TU4An3ZLost6Sg8TKSjwsCRd6M6c88oe =QHtD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
