-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2011 02:07 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
> Chicken's inline egg would not support this. That's intended > for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL > replacement. Actually, while I'm at it, can the inline egg and/or Larceny support literal unrepresentables indirectly via the trick Per Bothner suggested earlier? Namely, that such unrepresentables are replaced by placeholders which are filled in at run-time? ABS - -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6FwGkACgkQRgz/WHNxCGo99QCggkfLK6dhxr2Gkkq6i4OLo1W2 i/0AoJRE2AO55dPFREiN7TnLooV70rbH =SxZx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
