Regarding "Other language changes since R5RS", there are a couple points regarding syntax definitions being allowed anywhere. The second one (internal syntax definitions) is probably redundant.
I would change the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" to "Differences from R6RS", and be a lot less snarky and defensive. Simply state the differences. Phrases like "the WG considers extensibility to be important" add nothing. I wouldn't even try to justify things -- there are so many points... I would also remove the section on incompatibilities with the r6rs standard libraries document. It's out of scope, really -- there is no need to mention syntax-case at all. Dunno. The section on R6RS needs some work, otherwise the document ends on a half-finished, sour note to me. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
