On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:56 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit: > > > My preference is to remove the entire section about R6RS. > > Unfortunately, the WG voted to have it there. However, I am willing > to change my vote, and if either Arthur or Alaric will do the same, > then we can flush it and reclaim a whole page. Given the amount of > headache it has been, I would urge this action. > R6RS is out there, though, and even though R7RS-large is really what should be compared to R6RS, it is useful to have a concise comparison with R7RS-small. Given that we're unlikely to make big changes at this point, I don't see why we'd flush all that work.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
