Alex Shinn scripsit: > Well, the change list would have been much smaller comparing to R7RS-large.
Eh, maybe, maybe not. It would have been more fine-grained. > If we're going to keep it, it's probably best to remove the comments and > mini-rationales. I have done so now, squeezing the R6RS list down to bare bones, less than a page. In particular, the main and library documents are no longer separated, since most of what there is to say about the library document is "We didn't do it". I also (in a separate changeset) squeezed the R5RS list so as to save a complete page. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://ccil.org/~cowan In computer science, we stand on each other's feet. --Brian K. Reid _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
