> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation > restrictions like memory) exact integers?
No > 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers? Yes > 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers? Yes > 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers? Yes On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Alan Watson <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation >> restrictions like memory) exact integers? > > Yes. > >> 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers? > > Abstention. > >> 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers? > > Abstention. > >> 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers? > > Yes. > -- > Dr. Alan M. Watson > Instituto de Astronomía > Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México > > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports -- ==== Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb? A. No. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
