> On Sat, 3 May 2014 17:18:03 -0400, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the LAST CALL for votes on the numeric tower ballot, which is > currently worded as follows: 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation restrictions like memory) exact integers? yes 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers? yes 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers? no Not sure of this--maybe it's useful to some, but if not widely used, would it be a burden for implementations to *have to* provide it (for standards compliance)? 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers? yes
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
