John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the LAST CALL for votes on the numeric tower ballot, which is
> currently worded as follows:
>
> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
> restrictions like memory) exact integers?
Yes.
> 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers?
Yes.
> 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers?
No opinion.
> 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers?
No opinion.
All the best,
J.-M. Hufflen
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
