scheme-reports  

Messages by Thread

• [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material Jussi Piitulainen
• [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? Richard Kelsey
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Wolfgang De Meuter
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Wolfgang De Meuter
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] Reminder: public comment period on R7RS-small closes on June 30 John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Duncan Steele
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Duncan Steele
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Eli Barzilay
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft Alex Shinn
  • [Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations Göran Weinholt
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule Mike Morgan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Trac Migration Complete Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Peter Bex
  • [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Daniel Villeneuve
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
• [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Andrew Robbins
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Aubrey Jaffer
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity Peter Bex
• [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? leppie
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] I/O Kristen Eisenberg
• [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Queiroz
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alaric Snell-Pym
  • [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) Peter Bex
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) Andrew Robbins
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines) John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Jeronimo Pellegrini
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn

• Earlier messages
• Later messages