scheme-reports
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Jeronimo Pellegrini
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Marc Feeley
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
xacc.ide
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319
Ray Dillinger
[Scheme-reports] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] command-line
Bill Schottstaedt
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Bill Schottstaedt
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Bill Schottstaedt
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Noah Lavine
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Emmanuel Medernach
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Aleksej Saushev
Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
Emmanuel Medernach
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] fifth ballot results are in
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Aubrey Jaffer
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
Aubrey Jaffer
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
Stefan Edwards
[Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS.
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS.
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Ref cells
Biep
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ref cells
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
quad
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Jussi Piitulainen
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
quad
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Jussi Piitulainen
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Andrew Robbins
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Andrew Robbins
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Andrew Robbins
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
Stefan Edwards
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
quad
[Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
xacc.ide
Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] The history of EQV? on numbers
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
Andrew Robbins
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
Biep
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
Jussi Piitulainen
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
Biep
Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Helmut Eller
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Michael Montague
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Michael Montague
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Michael Montague
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Michael Montague
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
leppie
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Arthur Smyles
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Arthur Smyles
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Andrew Robbins
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Noah Lavine
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbolelement>*| to #"<string element>*"
Cory Burgett
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Stephen Leach
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Arthur Smyles
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
Alan Watson
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Centered Division
Noah Lavine
[Scheme-reports] Equality of records
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
Alaric Snell-Pym
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
Stephen Leach
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
Eli Barzilay
Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
Alex Shinn
Earlier messages
Later messages