pgeorges schrieb: Hi!
> There is no change in DB format, but I changed block > sizes. Well I admit that I can not judge what consequences this has. > I increased their values but it had the drawback that PGN > tags strip was significantly slower (I/O performance > issue). So in current CVS I put old values back. Ok, so actually the old code should be in place there again? > This is the only important change that was made in that > field, and the trickiest. But as you noticed it never > prevent any Scid version from 3.6.2 to 3.6.22 to open a > base generated in Scid 3.6.1. That's not my point here. It's just good to know that there was something going on there. And of course I'd really love to have my RefDB consistent. This DB normally is owned by root:root permissions r--r--r--, you know? Only once a year or so, and if a new book comes in, I add the games of one year at once and then set back the permissions to "untouchable". All other things are done outside that DB and then merged in. > This issue is annoying, and I would like to get a way to > reproduce it. Dito. I'll try hard to find more information. > If I can reproduce it I am sure to be able to fix it, but > if I can't reproduce it I am also sure I will not fix it. I know your point, and I'm really trying hard to give more information to nail it down. Now I'll go home for today and maybe work in another bunch of refs. Maybe I can come up with some addtional information. -- Kind regards, Alexander Wagner Universitaetsbibliothek Ilmenau Langewiesener Str. 37 98693 Ilmenau Tel.: 03677/69-4521 , Fax.: 03677/69-4617 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
