On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least > in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the > underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things at once and > therefore getting each different virtualization technology wrong in > different ways. > > If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and configure pair-bonding in the > virtual appliances.
Aside from the previous reply, I get that you think KVM is a steaming pile how does this relate to Yasha's question? More to the point, how do you feel about VirtualBox as an enterprise platform?
