On 08/04/14 14:06, zxq9 wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least >> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the >> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things at once and >> therefore getting each different virtualization technology wrong in >> different ways. >> >> If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and configure pair-bonding in the >> virtual appliances. > > Aside from the previous reply, I get that you think KVM is a steaming pile > how > does this relate to Yasha's question? More to the point, how do you feel > about > VirtualBox as an enterprise platform? >
I'm a little biased - but check out: http://xen.crc.id.au/ -- Steven Haigh Email: net...@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
