Co-sign that Co-sign.

----- Original Message -----
From: James Landrith 
Date: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:42 am
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] 'Jericho' too cynical for the times?
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

> Co-sign.
> 
> 
> 
> From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] 'Jericho' too cynical for the times?
> 
> 
> 
> interesting question, that touches on something I've been 
> thinking about
> recently: when is scifi or speculative fiction too topical, 
> "real", or
> downbeat? I asked because my younger brother last night was 
> telling me that
> one reason he didn't like the new Battlestar Galactica was 
> because it was
> based too much on current issues: terrorism, religious 
> fundamentalism, etc.
> I've heard others say the same thing, including a guy who quit 
> watchingbecause he felt he was getting hit over the head with a 
> thinly-veiled satire
> of our times. "I just want good outer space action without all the
> socio-political stuff" he grumped.
> 
> I've heard many others say the same, that they want their 
> scifi/speculativefiction to be escapist fare. They seem to want 
> action, explosions, great fX,
> BEMs, gunfire, spaceships, scantily clad women, etc., but 
> please: no
> depression reality intruding on their fantasy!
> 
> I tend to favor the stuff that's topical, 'cause done right it 
> can be
> enjoyed years later, even when the subject matter may not be 
> front and
> center in society at that time. One of the reasons I loved B5 
> and DS9 was
> *because* they dealt with real life issues of racism, religion, and
> politics. And in that same vein, I liked it when "Jericho" 
> viewed our modern
> world through a lens of (perhaps cynical) reality. 
> For me, the best stuff--even scifi and spec fiction--tells the 
> "truth", or
> "a" truth. So no, not too cynical for me.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to