http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09rich.html?_r=2
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09rich.html?_r=2&ref=opinion&oref
=slogin&oref=login> &ref=opinion&oref=slogin&oref=login

 

November 9, 2008

Op-Ed Columnist


It Still Felt Good the Morning After 


By FRANK RICH
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/fra
nkrich/index.html?inline=nyt-per> 

ON the morning after a black man won the White House, America’s tears of
catharsis gave way to unadulterated joy. 

Our nation was still in the same ditch it had been the day before, but the
atmosphere was giddy. We felt good not only because we had breached a racial
barrier as old as the Republic. Dawn also brought the realization that we
were at last emerging from an abusive relationship with our country’s
21st-century leaders. The festive scenes of liberation that Dick Cheney had
once imagined for Iraq were finally taking place — in cities all over
America.

For eight years, we’ve been told by those in power that we are small,
bigoted and stupid — easily divided and easily frightened. This was the
toxic catechism of Bush-Rove politics. It was the soiled banner picked up by
the sad McCain campaign, and it was often abetted by an amen corner in the
dominant news media. We heard this slander of America so often that we all
started to believe it, liberals most certainly included. If I had a dollar
for every Democrat who told me there was no way that Americans would ever
turn against the war in Iraq or definitively reject Bush governance or elect
a black man named Barack Hussein Obama president, I could almost start to
recoup my 401(k). Few wanted to take yes for an answer.

So let’s be blunt. Almost every assumption about America that was taken as a
given by our political culture on Tuesday morning was proved wrong by
Tuesday night. 

The most conspicuous clichés to fall, of course, were the twin suppositions
that a decisive number of white Americans wouldn’t vote for a black
presidential candidate — and that they were lying to pollsters about their
rampant racism. But the polls were accurate. There was no “Bradley effect.”
A higher percentage of white men
<http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/no_20081020_4093.php>  voted for
Obama than any Democrat since Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton included. 

Obama also won all four of those hunting-and-Hillary-loving Rust Belt states
that became 2008’s obsession among slumming upper-middle-class white
journalists: Pennsylvania
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/pennsylvania.html>  and
Michigan <http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/michigan.html>
by double digits, as well as Ohio
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/ohio.html>  and even
Indiana <http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/indiana.html> ,
which has gone
<http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-indianaoct18,0,6173297.s
tory>  Democratic only once (1964) since 1936. The solid Republican South,
led by Virginia
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/virginia.html>  and North
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/north-carolina.html>
Carolina, started to turn blue as well. While there are still bigots in
America, they are in unambiguous retreat. 

And what about all those terrified Jews who reportedly abandoned their
progressive heritage to buy into the smears libeling Obama as an
Israel-hating terrorist? Obama drew a
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html>
larger percentage of Jews nationally (78) than Kerry had (74) and — mazel
tov, Sarah Silverman <http://www.thegreatschlep.com/> ! — won Florida
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/florida.html> .

Let’s defend Hispanic-Americans, too, while we’re at it. In one of the more
notorious observations of the campaign year, a Clinton pollster, Sergio
Bendixen, told
<http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/01/21/080121fa_fact_lizza?currentPa
ge=3>  The New Yorker in January that “the Hispanic voter — and I want to
say this very carefully — has not shown a lot of willingness or affinity to
support black candidates.” Let us say very carefully that a black
presidential candidate won
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html>
Latinos — the fastest-growing demographic in the electorate — 67 percent to
31 (up from Kerry’s 53-to-44 edge and Gore’s 62-to-35).

Young voters also triumphed over the condescension of the experts. “Are they
going to show up?” Cokie Roberts of ABC News asked in February. “Probably
not. They never have before. By the time November comes, they’ll be tired.”
In fact they turned up in larger numbers than in 2004
<http://www.civicyouth.org/?p=322> , and their disproportionate Democratic
margin made a serious difference, as did their hard work on the ground.
They’re not the ones who need Geritol.

The same commentators who dismissed every conceivable American demographic
as racist, lazy or both got Sarah Palin wrong too. When she made her debut
in St. Paul, the punditocracy was nearly uniform in declaring her selection
a brilliant coup. There hadn’t been so much instant over-the-top praise by
the press for a cynical political stunt since President Bush “landed” a jet
on the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln in that short-lived triumph “Mission
Accomplished.” 

The rave reviews for Palin were completely disingenuous. Anyone paying
attention (with the possible exception of John McCain) could see she was
woefully ill-equipped to serve half-a-heartbeat away from the presidency.
The conservatives Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy said so on MSNBC when
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/03/peggy-noonan-mike-murphy_n_123647.
html>  they didn’t know their mikes were on. But, hey, she was a dazzling TV
presence, the thinking went, so surely doltish Americans would rally around
her anyway. “She killed!” cheered Noonan
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122300786229301597.html>  about the
vice-presidential debate, revising her opinion upward and marveling at
Palin’s gift for talking “over the heads of the media straight to the
people.” Many talking heads thought she
<http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1846995,00.html>  tied
<http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1846977,00.html>  or beat
Joe Biden.

The people, however, were reaching a less charitable conclusion and were
well ahead of the Beltway curve in fleeing Palin. Only after polls confirmed
that she was costing McCain votes did conventional wisdom in Washington
finally change, demoting her from Republican savior to scapegoat overnight. 

But Palin’s appeal wasn’t overestimated only because of her kitschy
“American Idol” star quality. Her fierce embrace of the old Karl Rove wedge
politics, the divisive pitting of the “real America” against the secular
“other” America, was also regarded as a sure-fire winner. The second most
persistent assumption by both pundits and the McCain campaign this year —
after the likely triumph of racism — was that the culture war battlegrounds
from 2000 and 2004 would remain intact. 

This is true in exactly one instance: gay civil rights. Though Rove’s
promised “permanent Republican majority” lies in humiliating ruins, his and
Bush’s one secure legacy will be their demagogic exploitation of homophobia.
The success of the four state
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/06marriage.html>  initiatives
banning either same-sex marriage or same-sex adoptions was the sole retro
trend on Tuesday. And Obama, who largely soft-pedaled the issue this year,
was little help. In California, where other races split more or less evenly
on a same-sex marriage ban, some
<http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/11/70-of-african-a.html>  70
percent of black voters contributed <http://www.slate.com/id/2203912/>  to
its narrow victory. 

That lagging indicator aside, nearly every other result on Tuesday suggests
that while the right wants to keep fighting the old boomer culture wars, no
one else does. Three
<http://vote.sos.ca.gov/Returns/props/map190000000004.htm>  state
<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/11/04/politics/main4571643.shtml>
initiatives
<http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/nov/05/voters-reject-amendment-4
8-personhood-issue/>  restricting abortion failed. Bill Ayers proved a lame
villain, scaring no one. Americans do not want to revisit Vietnam (including
in Iraq). For all the attention paid by the news media and McCain-Palin to
rancorous remembrances of things past, I sometimes wondered whether most
Americans thought the Weather Underground was a reunion band and the Hanoi
Hilton a chain hotel. Socialism, the evil empire and even Ronald Reagan may
be half-forgotten blurs too.

If there were any doubts the 1960s are over, they were put to rest Tuesday
night when our new first family won the hearts of the world as it emerged
<http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/speeches/obama-victory-
speech.html>  on that vast blue stage to join the celebration in Chicago’s
Grant Park. The bloody skirmishes that took place on that same
<http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/6420.html>  spot during
the Democratic convention 40 years ago — young vs. old, students vs. cops,
white vs. black — seemed as remote as the moon. This is another America —
hardly a perfect or prejudice-free America, but a union that can change and
does, aspiring to perfection even if it can never achieve it.

Still, change may come slowly to the undying myths bequeathed to us by the
Bush decade. “Don’t think for a minute that power concedes,” Obama is fond
of <http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/27/campaign.wrap/index.html>
saying. Neither does groupthink. We now keep hearing, for instance, that
America is “a center-right nation” — apparently because the percentages of
Americans who call themselves
<http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1>  conservative
(34), moderate (44) and liberal (22) remain virtually unchanged
<http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
>  from four years ago. But if we’ve learned anything this year, surely it’s
that labels are overrated. Those same polls find that more and more
self-described conservatives no longer consider themselves Republicans.
Americans now say they favor government doing more
<http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p3>  (51 percent),
not less (43) — an 11-point swing since
<http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
>  2004 — and they still overwhelmingly reject the
<http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p6>  Iraq war.
That’s a centrist country tilting center-left, and that’s the majority who
voted for Obama.

The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven
away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans,
Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly,
working-class Americans. Who’s left? The only states where the G.O.P.
increased its percentage of the presidential vote relative to the Democrats
were West
<http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/11/05/us/politics/20081104_ELECTION
_RECAP.html>  Virginia, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arkansas. Even the North
Carolina county where Palin expressed
<http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/17/palin_clarifies_her_p
ro-americ.html>  her delight at being in the “real America” went
<http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/palins_real_america
_voted_big.php>  for Obama by more than 18 percentage points.

The actual real America is everywhere. It is the America that has been in
shell shock since the aftermath of 9/11, when our government wielded a
brutal attack by terrorists as a club to ratchet up our fears, betray our
deepest constitutional values and turn Americans against one another in the
name of “patriotism.” What we started to remember the morning after Election
Day was what we had forgotten over the past eight years, as our abusive
relationship with the Bush administration and its press enablers dragged on:
That’s not who we are. 

So even as we celebrated our first black president, we looked around and
rediscovered the nation that had elected him. “We are the ones we’ve been
waiting for,” Obama said in
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/us/politics/05text-obama.html>  February,
and indeed millions of such Americans were here all along, waiting for a
leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country.

 

Reply via email to