You say that like its a bad thing.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, keithbjohn...@... wrote:
>
> Okay, so her pedigree would be that she's potentially as unstable 
as Jolie? That lunatic light in the eyes, that's frightening and 
attractive at the same time? Hmmm...  Well, next you'll be telling me 
Fox cuts herself ritually, sleeps with a knife under her pillow, and 
wears a vial of her beloved's blood around her neck.
> 
> 
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "ravenadal" <ravena...@...>
> > I base my "feral" comment not so much on Fox's film work as on her
> > reported real life.  Apparently, the tattooed Fox is quite a 
gonzo girl.  
> > 
> > "Every time I get a tattoo, it's a little fuck-you to anyone who 
tells
> > me not to. It's weird to be part of Hollywood, which tries to 
control
> > every aspect of people, from what they say to the color of their 
hair.
> > And I like the way getting a tattoo feels. If I'm depressed, it's 
nice
> > to get one and deal with the pain. I have one all the way down to 
my
> > ribs. It hurt, but it felt good like twisting a loose tooth. I'm 
not
> > kidding when I say that if I ever lose a role because of my 
tattoos,
> > I'll quit Hollywood and go to work at Costco."
> > 
> > ~Megan Fox
> > 
> > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, KeithBJohnson@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Well said, as always. Fox as "feral"? Hmmm... she certainly can 
look
> > the part in posing for pics, but never seen it in the acting. I 
guess
> > the move toward more of a "Barbie Doll" figure then it already is 
just
> > bugs me.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > > From: "ravenadal" <ravenadal@>
> > > > I can see human barbie-doll Megan Fox as Lara Croft.  There 
is 
> > > > something very fetishistic about the whole Lara Croft 
franchise and 
> > > > Fox brings with her a similar internet based cult of 
personality.  
> > > > Although Jolie is a good actress (and good actors make good 
superhero 
> > > > movies), acting has nothing to do with this. More 
importantly, like 
> > > > Jolie, there is something feral about Fox that is essential 
for any 
> > > > potential Tomb Raider.
> > > > 
> > > > ~rave!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, KeithBJohnson@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sad thing is, I didn't think the Tomb Raider movies were 
that bad. 
> > > > Forgettable, perhaps, but not junk like what's served up on 
SciFi. 
> > > > Indeed, there were the basics of good movies here: Jolie's 
presence 
> > > > (she can play borderline psycho/aggressive like nobody), 
decent 
> > > > directing, and guest stars a cut above the norm in 
scifi/adventure 
> > > > movies (Daniel Craig, Jon Voight, Gerard Butler, Djimon 
Honsou). 
> > > > Indeed, as I've seen a billion times, the second flick made 
me think 
> > > > Jolie had the chops to start a real spy movie franchise.  
> > > > > I always wanted the writers to tweak the stories and make 
it 
> > > > something more solid.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I haven't seen anything to make me think Meagan Fox can act 
as well 
> > > > as Jolie even in a throwaway action flick, and 
the "directional 
> > > > change" worries me. I fear we'll end up with something even 
more 
> > > > forgettable: complete American-style over-the-top action and 
violence 
> > > > with crazy camera angles, devoid of anything remotely 
interesting. In 
> > > > short, something on the level of Resident Evil or the 
increasingly 
> > > > stupid "Transporter" movies.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oh well, such is life. I'm more anxious to see Vin Diesel 
tweak the 
> > > > Chronicles of Riddick thing and bring a sequel movie our 
way...
> > > > > 
> > > > > ************************
> > > > > 
> > > > > [ AP ]
> > > > > 
> > > > > Angelina Jolie's loss may just be Megan Fox's gain.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Warner Bros. has confirmed plans to relaunch—and completely 
> > > > overhaul—the hot pants-wearing, artifact-collecting Lara 
Croft: Tomb 
> > > > Raider franchise, with the first major casualty being Jolie.
> > > > > 
> > > > > According to the Hollywood Reporter, the third film will 
completely 
> > > > reboot the video game-based character, including changing her 
origin 
> > > > story (most likely shying away from her English aristocracy 
roots) 
> > > > and introduce new kinds of missions, love interests and 
villains.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And, most notably, a new leading lady.
> > > > > 
> > > > > While producers say an actress likely won't be cast until a 
writer 
> > > > and director have signed on, Fox has emerged as the 
frontrunner 
> > > > replacement, at least as far as the blogosphere is concerned.
> > > > > 
> > > > > While Lara Croft: Tomb Raider and its inconsistently 
punctuated 
> > > > sequel Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life were 
produced by 
> > > > Paramount, the rights to the series have since reverted back 
to video 
> > > > game purveyor Eidos. In December, Time Warner increased its 
stake in 
> > > > the multimedia company, ensuring in-house studio Warner Bros. 
first 
> > > > dibs to what has been a lucrative, abeit critically panned, 
franchise.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The first installment, released in 2001, grossed $275 
million 
> > > > worldwide, while the 2003 sequel earned $157 million. All 
told, the 
> > > > video game series, which launched in 1996, has accounted for 
more 
> > > > than $1 billion.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to