GW, You've hit the proverbial nail on the head. It was a good movie, I enjoyed much of it, but it didn't *feel* like Trek. And when some people hear my complaints they think I'm trying to be a "purist" or that I don't like the timeline/alternate reality change. And that's not it at all. I'm not one of those folks who was griping because there was a woman in charge on Voyager or because Picard didn't go around fighting everyone like Kirk did. I like those kinds of changes. I think the timeline/alternate reality thing is bold--even if I'll miss the old guys. No, my issues lay on whether this new Trek will still continue in the vision that (imho) gave the stories such a massive fanbase and following.
Sin/Black Galactus --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, gwashin...@... wrote: > > > In a message dated 5/10/09 11:45:06 AM, adrianne.bren...@... writes: > > > > > > I dunno. I don't see what they're doing as being any different from the > > reboot of Doctor Who, except with more major canonical differences. > > > > At least in the Doctor Who reboots they made a great effort to at least > keep with the spirit of the show and it's cannonal history. Even if they > did > change it. And inspite of those changes it, In short still 'felt' like > Doctor Who. > > > -GTW > > > ************** > The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 > Easy Steps! > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222376999x1201454299/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62& > bcd=May51009AvgfooterNO62) >
