For me it indeed 'felt' like Trek. I guess its a case of YMMV.
Meta --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "sincere1906" <sincere1...@...> wrote: > > GW, > > You've hit the proverbial nail on the head. It was a good movie, I enjoyed > much of it, but it didn't *feel* like Trek. And when some people hear my > complaints they think I'm trying to be a "purist" or that I don't like the > timeline/alternate reality change. And that's not it at all. I'm not one of > those folks who was griping because there was a woman in charge on Voyager or > because Picard didn't go around fighting everyone like Kirk did. I like those > kinds of changes. I think the timeline/alternate reality thing is bold--even > if I'll miss the old guys. No, my issues lay on whether this new Trek will > still continue in the vision that (imho) gave the stories such a massive > fanbase and following. > > Sin/Black Galactus > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, GWashin891@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 5/10/09 11:45:06 AM, adrianne.brennan@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > I dunno. I don't see what they're doing as being any different from the > > > reboot of Doctor Who, except with more major canonical differences. > > > > > > > At least in the Doctor Who reboots they made a great effort to at least > > keep with the spirit of the show and it's cannonal history. Even if they > > did > > change it. And inspite of those changes it, In short still 'felt' like > > Doctor Who. > > > > > > -GTW > > > > > > ************** > > The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 > > Easy Steps! > > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222376999x1201454299/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62& > > bcd=May51009AvgfooterNO62) > > >
