I like Olivia Munn. She is a funny in a edgy geeky kind of way. I have yet
to see her act outside of silly skits on her show.

I hate to say it but you need more than a young woman in shorts to drive a
movie nowadays. Audiences are a little more sophisticated than they once
were and Hollywood needs to learn that lesson.

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Daryle Lockhart
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> Yes,  sorry  about that. Dreamworks is actually the studio behind this
> franchise. Spielberg is Exec producer. Though,  I've reviewed my notes,  and
> it  looks like Spielberg may have lost Transformers in the divorce from
> Paramount. Not totally sure.  I DO know the new Dreamworks is going to  be a
> very tightly run ship.  Disney is FAMOUS for micromanaging a project, and
> this is Reliance's big foray into  American movie making. So  this is going
> to  be an interesting  ride. If Paramount keeps Transformers...I dunno.
>  Seems like  they're gonna just  let  the wheels come off, take the writeoff
> (and tax credits)  and then pull the plug after 3 movies.
>
> As an aside...we haven't had our poll here in a while,  but I,  for one,
>  am tired of Megan Fox,  and after seeing Jennifer's Body...I vote no
> confidence in Megan's looks to carry a movie. Or even a scene. It is time to
>  give Olivia Munn of G4 more to do. As eye candy goes...it's time for more
> diversity for real.
>
>
> On May 14, 2010, at 7:42 PM, Keith Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> I just can't raise the excitement to watch the second one. Like I said, the
> over-the-top camera work--and you *know* how much I rail against hyperactive
> cameras in movies--turned me off. I watched a good twenty minutes in the
> Sony store at Lenox Mall here in Atlanta, and I developed a headache, as if
> I'd eaten too much sugar and fat-laden food in a hurry. it was noise,
> explosions, and quick-cut scenes.
> Meagan Fox is gorgeous, truly one of the prettiest actresses around. I
> always applaud H'Wood when it remembers that raven-haired beauties deserve
> as much of a chance as the blondes who too often dominate. But i've never
> sat through a scifi movie only because an actress in it was pretty.
>
> Can you explain the studio reference you mentioned? Is Dreamworks behind
> Transformers?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daryle Lockhart" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 8:19:32 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] LaBeouf Says Third "Transformers" Movie Will Be
>  Better
>
>
>
> Let's just say...he's in Oliver Stone's "Wall Street 2: Money Never
> Sleeps".
>
> Transformers 2 was sloppy. they  were editing that  movie up until 1 month
> before it hit screens.  It  was trying to  do  too much.  That,  and
> everybody  was drinking the Megan Fox Kool-Aid.
>
> I  believe T3 will be better if the studio tightens its grip  on Michael
> Bay. Dreamworks isn't at Paramount anymore. This is Disney and Reliance.
>  They WILL get this right  or we'll  be reading about a ROM movie coming out
> in 2012.
>
>
> On May 14, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Martin Baxter wrote:
>
>
>
> Keith, I haven't seen the first one. This isn't much in the way of
> inspiration to invest. LaBoeuf is a good actor. He's gotta be getting better
> offers than this. I HOPE.
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Keith Johnson 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Interesting. I still haven't seen the second one. The bloated action
>> trailers, the long snippets I've seen on TVs at  electronic stores, those
>> stereotyped ghetto robots--all kept me away from the sequel. Didn't help I
>> wasn't too impressed with the first flick past the FX. The way the
>> Transformers were minimized in favor of the stupid humans didn't appeal to
>> me, nor did the change to lore (the "Lifespark"? Megatron the source for
>> most of our tech? Blah!) If LeBeouf himself is saying the second one was
>> worse? I may never see it...
>>
>> *********************
>> LaBeouf promises better 'Transformers' next time
>> By DAVID GERMAIN
>>
>> The Associated Press
>>
>>
>> CANNES, France — Shia LaBeouf says the second "Transformers" movie got too
>> big for its own good — but the third one brings the heart back to the
>> franchise.
>> LaBeouf, who starts work on the next "Transformers" sequel Tuesday, said
>> the third installment will be the best one yet. The new script restores a
>> human element that got lost in the second movie, LaBeouf said.
>>
>>
>> "When I saw the second movie, I wasn't impressed with what we did,"
>> LaBeouf said in an interview Thursday at the Cannes Film Festival, where his
>> finance drama "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps" is premiering. "There were
>> some really wild stunts in it, but the heart was gone."
>>
>>
>> "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" was a runaway commercial success but
>> was drubbed by critics.
>>
>> Michael Bay returns for the third time as director of the science-fiction
>> franchise, which centers on dueling races of giant robots that bring their
>> war to Earth. The next movie will have what the last one lacked — a sense of
>> human consequences, LaBeouf said.
>>
>>
>> On the second movie, "we got lost. We tried to get bigger. It's what
>> happens to sequels. It's like, how do you top the first one? You've got to
>> go bigger," LaBeouf said. "Mike went so big that it became too big, and I
>> think you lost the anchor of the movie. ... You lost a bit of the
>> relationships. Unless you have those relationships, then the movie doesn't
>> matter. Then it's just a bunch of robots fighting each other."
>>
>> With "Transformers 3," the toll of the robot war will be grave for our
>> planet, LaBeouf said.
>>
>>
>> "There's going to be a lot of death, human death. This time, they're
>> targeting humans," LaBeouf said. "It's going to be the craziest action movie
>> ever made, or we failed."
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
> wrote the script?" -- Charles E Grant
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>



-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

Reply via email to