If they wait any longer it will become impossible to send any team into
space. Or is it the cost of bureaucracy and could be done by a private
corporation for 1/100th of the cost?

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Martin Baxter <martinbaxt...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> We can, but it's expensive as all get-out.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Mr. Worf <hellomahog...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I was watching a show about mining the moon last night. They said that the
>> cost of returning to the moon would be about $100 Billion now. I don't
>> understand how it could cost so much money to do a manned mission. I wonder
>> how much of the cost would change if they were to use a
>> different propulsion system?
>>
>> One question I do have is why can't they make H3 here? They are saying
>> that one ton of H3 would be worth several billion.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Keith Johnson 
>> <keithbjohn...@comcast.net>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Somewhere in my old house in Fort Worth is a schematic of an ion drive I
>>> did in second grade, after watching an ep of "Star Trek" (had to be "Spock's
>>> Brain"), and reading about electrolytes in my encyclopedia set. I'd read
>>> about how cesium, when immersed in water, would produce ions in solution,
>>> and I'd read about theories for Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), the idea of
>>> using fusion power to drive plasma as a source of motion. Then there was
>>> that Trek ep where they said the aliens who took Spock's brain used ion
>>> power, which Kirk said was even beyond Federation tech. So, sure that I'd
>>> stumbled on a major secret, I took pen to paper. I drew a cutaway of the
>>> Jupiter Two from Lost in Space. Inside was  a giant water tank. Sitting next
>>> to the tank, like a coal scuttle on a stem locomotive, was a big pile of
>>> cesium bricks--just sitting there.  Next to them were some crazy robot arms
>>> with gloved "hands" (think of all the robot extremities as depicted in old
>>> cartoons).  The robot hands--two of them--would take turns dumping cesium
>>> bricks into the water tank. Attached to the tank was a big A battery and
>>> wiring so that the ions in solution could be driven to one side of the tank
>>> by the negative pole of the battery. I then had what was for all the world a
>>> tailpipe sticking out the side of the ship, through which the electrons
>>> would shoot into space.
>>> Of course, my eight year old self was certain I'd just solved the problem
>>> of both ion drive and FTL travel. To this day I remember how excited I was
>>> at what I thought I'd created!
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Mr. Worf" <hellomahog...@gmail.com>
>>> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>>> Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2010 4:02:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Subcritical accelerator driven thorium nuclear
>>> reactor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The truly futuristic stuff is starting to appear. Once people completely
>>> move away from the big government thinking on energy I think the flood gates
>>> will open with new ideas.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Martin Baxter 
>>> <martinbaxt...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Took them long enough.
>>>>
>>>> One of my college instructors had a similar thought back in the late
>>>> 70s. A shame he's passed on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mr. Worf <hellomahog...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are details of the subcritical accelerator driven thorium nuclear
>>>>> reactor designed by Nobel Laureate Carlo Rubbia. 
>>>>> <http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/08/uk-telegraph-supports-new-thorium.html>This
>>>>> reactor was given a supportive article by the UK Telegraph. It has been
>>>>> extensively studied for over 15 years and is expected to have half the 
>>>>> cost
>>>>> of existing light water reactors and burn up almost all of the nuclear 
>>>>> fuel.
>>>>> The Norwegian group Aker Solutions has bought Dr Rubbia’s patent for the
>>>>> thorium fuel-cycle, and is working on his design for a proton accelerator 
>>>>> at
>>>>> its UK operation. They are raising 100 million pounds ($150 million USD) 
>>>>> for
>>>>> the next stage of an estimated 2 billion pound ($3 billion USD) project to
>>>>> develop the first commercial unit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_VyTCyizqrHs/THyDzmlalII/AAAAAAAAI3U/xWKRAKNWsYI/s1600/rubbiaenergyamp.gif>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on 
>>>>> Reddit<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.reddit.com>,
>>>>> orStumbleUpon<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.stumbleupon.com>.
>>>>> Thanks*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Supporting Advertising*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Business 
>>>>> Success*<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.nextbigfuture.com/p/searchresults.html?PLUCKsearchTerm=Business%20Success&PLUCKwhichPage=relatedAdLinks>
>>>>>
>>>>>    *How to Make Money*    
>>>>> <http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.nextbigfuture.com/p/searchresults.html?PLUCKsearchTerm=How%20to%20Make%20Money&PLUCKwhichPage=relatedAdLinks>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Executive Jobs 
>>>>> *<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.nextbigfuture.com/p/searchresults.html?PLUCKsearchTerm=Executive%20Jobs&PLUCKwhichPage=relatedAdLinks>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Paid 
>>>>> Surveys*<http://www.feedblitz.com/t2.asp?/64651/17726256/0/http://www.nextbigfuture.com/p/searchresults.html?PLUCKsearchTerm=Paid%20Surveys&PLUCKwhichPage=relatedAdLinks>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Thank You*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Ea/Wmn2-tT9a-FsnfprokBSWUY2yCk/0/da>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Ea/Wmn2-tT9a-FsnfprokBSWUY2yCk/1/da>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody
>>>> hell wrote the script?" -- Charles E Grant
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> "If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
> wrote the script?" -- Charles E Grant
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
>
>
> 
>

Reply via email to