On Sun, Sep 4, 2016, at 01:32, Egor Panfilov wrote: >> You mean RFCs like PEPs? > > Exactly. I think, this format would help to accumulate our opinions on > different matters (e.g. how to we treat and depend on `matplotlib`)
We should chat to Ralf Gommers to find out how successful the Enhancement Proposal approach has been for SciPy, which is similar to this project in many ways. > Well, I'm just saying that we as a core team should drive the > evolution of backend and make life easier for contributors and users. > Like, try to imagine some new contributor making a PR introducing > Sphinx Gallery. Can't see this happenning. Of course, all of us are > working on this kind of features already, I just want to highlight > this (maybe trivial) point. > As a "practical guide", perhaps we should dedicate more time to the > _complex_ issues/requests/PRs we have. Still, I'm unclear how we can make it easier for newcomers to contribute to the backend. Do you have any practical suggestions? Best regards Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to scikit-image@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/1473072166.3811302.715986121.25BB7976%40webmail.messagingengine.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
