On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016, at 01:32, Egor Panfilov wrote: > > You mean RFCs like PEPs? > > > Exactly. I think, this format would help to accumulate our opinions on > different matters (e.g. how to we treat and depend on `matplotlib`) > > > We should chat to Ralf Gommers to find out how successful the Enhancement > Proposal approach has been for SciPy, which is similar to this project in > many ways. > Since we don't have those for SciPy, I'd say not very:) You're thinking about NumPy probably: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/neps/index.html https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/master/doc/neps We don't use them often, but when we do they've been valuable. For example the .npy version format is a good reference with rationale, and for complex discussions like datetime and NA it helps to summarize the issues and outlike solution directions (emails really don't work well for that). Cheers, Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to scikit-image@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/CABL7CQgTXn8qYoz1Dwk3cb1Uqf4dYS%2BApq%3DmWrfJ0o3XFgtTJQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
