Hans,
> indeed, and the config files contain keywords for the core languages
> (tex, pdftex, etex omega etc)
> context ships wih a bunch of keyword defs (one for each user interface
> language)
> since i use no other macro packages i have no other lists
Yes, I knew that most of the lists were for ConTeXt. But I don't understand the
use of these lists or what are the gains of using these lists comparing to not
using
them -- I tested with some ConTeXt sources and it seems that the ColouriseTeXDoc
works OK without setting %interface=en, nl, de etc. As I mentioned in the
original
message, users often define their own commands and structures, and these might
not
be in the lists, so might not get coloured if some of the interfaces is turned
on;
>> So
>> I'm wondering if you would accept the idea of replacing
>> ColouriseTeXDoc code
>> in LexTeX.cxx with something similar to ColoriseLaTeXDoc from
>> LexOthers.cxx.
> latex is just a macro package and the lexer is independent of the macro
> package; toe original lexer was flawed and not tex compliant; the
> current lexer is more configurable
> scite if the reference editor for editing support in context (a tex
> macro package) and its users now expect these the tex/mplexers to be
> there -)
OK, I am not proposing that removing the current ColouriseTeXDoc is a necessity.
I just wondered if using the lists in it is necessary. I wish to know how many
users
are depending on these interfaces now?
BTW, for me the two colourising procedures ColouriseTeXDoc and
ColouriseLaTeXDoc
work a little differently: the latter allows for asigning different colours to
inline maths and displayed maths, and also different colours for the tags
\begin{...} ... \end{...} and the contents therein, this is very convenient but
the former
does not have this effect; on the other hand the former allows for colourising
braces
which is also convenient while the latter doesn't do this.
_______________________________________________
Scintilla-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
