I change the subject because I don't see any link with the vote on the scm release.
And why you don't want to use this structure ?. -- Olivier 2008/8/25 ChrisGWarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> Try : >> svn co >> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/branches/olamy-test/ >> FireDragon-olamy-test && cd FireDragon-olamy-test && mvn >> release:prepare release:perform -B >> >> I have build two releases with success here : >> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/tags/ >> > > You have the results that I would expect from the normal nested maven > approach. > > However, it totally ignores my situation, namely the flattened structure, > which is what I need to have working. > > -Chris > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Maven-Scm-1.1-%28take-3%29-tp19123852p19139773.html > Sent from the Maven - SCM mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
