Do the authors of the original provider, or other users here, have an
opinion on this? I like that it is more complete (functionally, and in
docs and tests), however am not an accurev user myself.
What effect does the URL syntax change have?
Also Grant, I haven't seen the CLA yet?
- Brett
On 17/03/2009, at 11:58 PM, Grant Gardner wrote:
I've created the jira with attached code. Let me know if there's
anything
else I need to do.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-445
Will do the CLA when I find myself conveniently located near a fax or
scanner.
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 05:02:15 +1100, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
wrote:
1) Create a JIRA ticket under SCM
2) you might like to submit a CLA - you can do it regardless, and if
the work is accepted such a large chunk would probably require it
(see
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
and specifically http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt)
Thanks!
- Brett
On 07/03/2009, at 12:50 PM, Grant Gardner wrote:
Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release
plugin
and Continuum are working (for me).
Includes unit tests and tck tests for all the implemented commands.
How do I go about contributing the code?.
Grant.
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
